• Online Features  This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (5)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care  • Patient Education/ Health Literacy  • Pediatrics  • Pediatrics, Other  • Public Health  • Injury Prevention & Control  • Quality of Care  • Patient Safety/ Medical Error  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Sallie Thoreson, MS; Lindsey Myers, MPH; Cynthia Goss, MA; Carolyn DiGuiseppi, MD, MPH, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(3):261-267.

Objective  To compare child care center–based booster seat education and distribution with no intervention when implemented immediately after booster seat legislation.

Design  Cluster randomized controlled trial.

Setting  Thirty-nine urban child care centers.

Participants  Eight hundred fifty-four parents and 1010 children aged 4 to 8 years in vehicles leaving centers.

Intervention  We trained 168 staff members at 20 centers to give parents and children messages promoting booster seats and supplied lesson plans, children's activities, and free booster seats.

Main Outcome Measures  Observed booster seat use, "good practice" restraint use, and legal restraint use.

Results  Parents at intervention centers were more likely to report receiving restraint information from the center (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.48-6.67), speaking with staff about booster seats (AOR, 3.95; 95% CI, 2.26-6.88), and using fit to decide when to move children into seat belts (AOR, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.91-5.99). Groups did not differ in proportions using booster seats (44% vs 43%; AOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.62-1.73), good practice (42% vs 41%; AOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.70-1.74), or legal restraints (65% vs 65%; AOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48-1.31). Results were similar for children aged 4 to 5 and 6 to 8 years. All outcomes were significantly less likely among children riding in pickup trucks or with Hispanic or black drivers.

Conclusions  The intervention increased parents' receipt of information from center staff and knowledge about booster seats but not booster seat use. Research is needed to identify methods and messages that will empower center providers to promote booster seats effectively and reach high-risk populations.

Author Affiliations: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Grand Junction (Mss Thoreson and Myers), University of Colorado Denver, Denver (Ms Goss and Dr DiGuiseppi), and Colorado Injury Control Research Center, Fort Collins (Ms Goss and Dr DiGuiseppi).

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A controlled evaluation of the WHO Safe Communities model approach to injury prevention: increasing child restraint use in motor vehicles
Istre et al.
Inj. Prev. 2011;17:3-8.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The design and use of cluster randomised controlled trials in evaluating injury prevention interventions: part 1. Rationale, design and informed consent
DiGuiseppi and Coupland
Inj. Prev. 2010;16:61-67.
FULL TEXT