• Online Features  This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (2)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice  • Medical Ethics  • Pediatrics  • Pediatrics, Other  • Statistics and Research Methods  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

David Wendler, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(2):115-118.

The minimal risk standard allows institutional review boards (IRBs) to approve pediatric research when the risks do not exceed the risks children face in daily life or during routine examinations. The fact that the risks children face in daily life vary with age raises the question of whether IRBs should implement this standard by adopting 1, 2, 3, or even more risk standards. The level of research risks to which it is appropriate to expose children depends on their maturity level. While younger children should be exposed to only very low research risks, it can be appropriate to expose older children to somewhat higher risks. This analysis supports 2 thresholds for minimal risk in pediatric research: one for research with younger children and a distinct standard for older children who can understand and who agree to participate.

Author Affiliations: Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Cold Pressor Task: Is it an Ethically Acceptable Pain Research Method in Children?
Birnie et al.
J Pediatr Psychol 2011;36:1071-1081.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT