You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 10, October 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Pediatric/ Neonatal Critical Care
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Intervention at the Border of Viability

Perspective Over a Decade

Pamela K. Donohue, ScD; Renee D. Boss, MD; Jennifer Shepard, CRNP; Ernest Graham, MD; Marilee C. Allen, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(10):902-906.

Objective  To investigate prenatal management and outcome of infants born at the border of viability during 2 periods, 2001 to 2003 (late epoch) and 1993 to 1995 (early epoch).

Design  Cohort study.

Setting  Single academic, high-risk perinatal referral center.

Participants  All 160 women admitted to labor and delivery with a live fetus who delivered at an estimated gestational age of 220/7 weeks to 246/7 weeks.

Main Outcome Measures  Prenatal management and time between maternal admission and delivery or death of the fetus, infant resuscitation efforts, neonatal intensive care unit interventions, time of death, and morbidities in survivors.

Results  Mothers in both epochs were of similar age, race, and duration of pregnancy at hospital admission. Compared with the early epoch, women during the late epoch were more likely to be transported to a higher level of care (relative risk [RR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-2.57) and receive sonographic surveillance (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.07-2.04), antibiotics (RR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.10-2.33), and antenatal steroids (RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.22-2.12). Life-sustaining interventions were provided for infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit more frequently during the late epoch than the early epoch, including high-frequency ventilation (RR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.93-6.61), chest tubes (RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.06-1.94), dopamine administration (RR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.24-4.97), and steroid administration for blood pressure support (RR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.60-2.92). Gestational age–specific mortality was the same in the 2 epochs.

Conclusions  More interventions were provided for infants born at 22 to 24 weeks' gestation in the late epoch than the early epoch. Despite these changes in management, there has been no reduction in mortality in more than a decade.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Pediatrics (Drs Donohue, Boss, and Allen and Ms Shepard) and Gynecology and Obstetrics (Dr Graham), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (Dr Donohue), Baltimore, Maryland.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.