• Online Features  This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (9)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders  • Metabolic Diseases  • Pediatrics  • Neonatology and Infant Care  • Quality of Life  • Diagnosis  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Lisa A. Prosser, MS, PhD; Joseph A. Ladapo, PhD; Donna Rusinak, BA; Susan E. Waisbren, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(9):870-876.

Objective  To measure parental tolerance for a false-positive newborn screening result by assessing perceived quality of life for screening results and health states associated with expanded newborn screening programs for metabolic disorders.

Design  Perceived quality of life was measured using time trade-off and willingness-to-pay questions for a false-positive newborn screening result and other conditions associated with metabolic disorders (ie, short-term hospitalization, dietary treatments, and developmental delay).

Setting  Telephone or in-person interviews were conducted from October 1, 2004, through January 31, 2006, for 2 populations in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania.

Participants  Parents of children who had a false-positive newborn screening result (n = 91) and parents of children with normal screening results (n = 50).

Intervention  Telephone interviews.

Main Outcome Measures  Time trade-off and willingness-to-pay amounts.

Results  Median time trade-off and willingness-to-pay amounts for parents of children with false-positive screening results were both 0 compared with parents of children with normal screening results who had median values of 1 week (P = .07) and $100 (P < .001). For both populations, dietary treatments and developmental delay elicited higher time trade-off and willingness-to-pay amounts compared with ratings for experiencing a false-positive newborn screening result or short-term hospitalization because of an undiagnosed metabolic disorder.

Conclusions  Parents have a high tolerance for false-positive newborn screening results. Preferences for test outcomes and other health states associated with screening for metabolic disorders should be included in cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of expanded newborn screening programs.

Author Affiliations: Center for Child Health Care Studies, Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (Dr Prosser and Ms Rusinak), Program for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health (Dr Prosser), and Department of Psychiatry, Children's Hospital Boston (Dr Waisbren), Boston, Massachusetts; and PhD Program in Health Policy, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Dr Ladapo).

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Attitudes Toward Newborn Screening for Cytomegalovirus Infection
Din et al.
Pediatrics 2011;128:e1434-e1442.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Projected Costs, Risks, and Benefits of Expanded Newborn Screening for MCADD
Prosser et al.
Pediatrics 2010;125:e286-e294.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT