This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Asthma  • Allergy  • Review  • Pediatrics, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

What Is the Plan?

Roger L. Zemek, MD; Sanjit Kaur Bhogal, MSc; Francine M. Ducharme, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(2):157-163.

Objectives  To evaluate the independent effect of a written action plan vs no plan and to compare different plans to identify characteristics of effective plans in children with asthma.

Data Sources  We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Clinical Trials Register until March 2006, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for randomized controlled trials that evaluated asthma action plans in the pediatric population.

Study Selection  Eligible studies were randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials with participants aged 0 to 17 years diagnosed with asthma. Of 428 citations, 1 trial compared a peak flow–based plan with none and 4 parallel-group trials compared symptom-based plans with peak flow–based plans.

Intervention  Provision of a written action plan. Control groups received no action plan or another type of plan. All cointerventions (both medical and educational) were similar in both groups.

Main Outcome Measure  The number of children with at least 1 acute care asthma visit.

Results  Written action plan use significantly reduced acute care visits per child as compared with control subjects. Children using plans also missed less school, had less nocturnal awakening, and had improved symptom scores. As compared with peak flow–based plans, symptom-based plans significantly reduced the risk of a patient requiring an acute care visit.

Conclusions  Although there are limited data to firmly conclude that provision of an action plan is superior to none, there is clear evidence suggesting that symptom-based plans are superior to peak flow–based plans in children and adolescents.

Author Affiliations: Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (Dr Zemek); and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health (Ms Bhogal) and Department of Paediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre (Dr Ducharme), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Written Action Plans for Children with Asthma
JWatch General 2008;2008:4-4.
FULL TEXT