You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 9, September 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Spectral Gradient Acoustic Reflectometry Compared With Tympanometry in Diagnosing Middle Ear Effusion in Children Aged 6 to 24 Months

Jennifer Chianese, MD; Alejandro Hoberman, MD; Jack L. Paradise, MD; D. Kathleen Colborn, BS; Diana Kearney, RN; Howard E. Rockette, PhD; Marcia Kurs-Lasky, MS

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(9):884-888.

Objectives  To evaluate the accuracy of spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SGAR) in children aged 6 to 24 months, and to compare SGAR with tympanometry.

Design  Comparison of diagnostic tests.

Setting  Inner-city primary care center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Participants  A total of 786 healthy children aged 6 to 24 months.

Main Outcome Measures  Test characteristics of SGAR (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) and receiver operating characteristic curves from the SGAR and tympanometric data.

Results  The SGAR results were available for 3096 otoscopic examinations in 647 children. Tympanometric results were available for 2854 otoscopic examinations in 597 children. Using the recommended SGAR pass or fail cutoff, 53% of the ears in which effusion was present would have been considered effusion free (sensitivity, 47%). Only 10% of the ears without effusion would have been considered to have effusion (specificity, 90%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.78 for SGAR and 0.83 for tympanometry.

Conclusion  Spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry is slightly less discerning than tympanometry in predicting the presence or absence of middle ear effusion in children younger than 2 years.


Author Affiliations: Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (Drs Chianese, Hoberman, and Paradise and Mss Colborn and Kearney), and Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine (Drs Chianese, Hoberman, and Paradise) and Graduate School of Public Health (Dr Rockette and Ms Kurs-Lasky), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Tympanometry or Reflectometry for Confirming Middle Ear Effusion?
JWatch Pediatrics 2007;2007:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.