This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice, Other  • Pediatrics, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

Use of a Redistribution System

Stephen B. Freedman, MDCM, MSc, FRCPC; Vidhi A. Thakkar

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(9):870-876.

Objective  To evaluate the ability of a regionalized system to safely transfer patients requiring admission from a referral center to either regional or community hospitals.

Design  Cohort study of children requiring admission. Following transfer, a questionnaire was administered to eligible caregivers. Subsequent emergency department (ED) use was assessed by comparing children who were transferred with those who were not.

Setting  The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, from April 1, 2003, through March 31, 2004.

Participants  Caregivers of 371 children who underwent transfer from a tertiary care center ED to either a regional or a community hospital were eligible; 344 were contacted. Two hundred fifty-three children for whom transfer was considered but was not performed served as a comparison group.

Intervention  Questionnaire administered to caregivers, combined with database review.

Main Outcome Measures  Failure of the transfer process, caregiver satisfaction, and future tertiary care center ED use.

Results  Five children experienced intravenous access problems, and 4 children experienced delayed antibiotic administration. Caregiver satisfaction was 92.3% with the transfer process and 84.4% with the care at the receiving hospital. Forty-seven percent of caregivers indicated that they would agree to a similar transfer in the future. Two years later, fewer transferred children (39.9%) than those who were not transferred (49.6%) had revisited the tertiary care center ED (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.10). The mean number of visits was unchanged (95% confidence interval of the difference, –0.44 to 0.21 visits).

Conclusions  Although we found the redistribution program to be safe, caregivers stated a preference not to be transferred again. The redistribution system did not substantially alter tertiary care center ED use.

Author Affiliations: Division of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

RELATED ARTICLE

When There Is "No Room at the Inn": Potential Solution for Overcrowding in a Tertiary Pediatric Center
Steven E. Krug and Marianne Gausche-Hill
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(9):911-913.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

When There Is "No Room at the Inn": Potential Solution for Overcrowding in a Tertiary Pediatric Center
Krug and Gausche-Hill
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:911-913.
FULL TEXT