You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 4, April 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Child Development
 •Psychiatry
 •Autism
 •Alert me on articles by topic

A Prospective Study of Response to Name in Infants at Risk for Autism

Aparna S. Nadig, PhD; Sally Ozonoff, PhD; Gregory S. Young, PhD; Agata Rozga, MA; Marian Sigman, PhD; Sally J. Rogers, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(4):378-383.

Objective  To assess the sensitivity and specificity of decreased response to name at age 12 months as a screen for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and other developmental delays.

Design  Prospective, longitudinal design studying infants at risk for ASD.

Setting  Research laboratory at university medical center.

Participants  Infants at risk for autism (55 six-month-olds, 101 twelve-month-olds) and a control group at no known risk (43 six-month-olds, 46 twelve-month-olds). To date, 46 at-risk infants and 25 control infants have been followed up to 24 months.

Intervention  Experimental task eliciting response-to-name behavior.

Main Outcome Measures  Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Mullen Scales of Early Learning.

Results  At age 6 months, there was a nonsignificant trend for control infants to require a fewer number of calls to respond to name than infants at risk for autism. At age 12 months, 100% of infants in the control group "passed," responding on the first or second name call, while 86% in the at-risk group did. Three fourths of children who failed the task were identified with developmental problems at age 24 months. Specificity of failing to respond to name was 0.89 for ASD and 0.94 for any developmental delay. Sensitivity was 0.50 for ASD and 0.39 for any developmental delay.

Conclusions  Failure to respond to name by age 12 months is highly suggestive of developmental abnormality but does not identify all children at risk for developmental problems. Lack of responding to name is not universal among infants later diagnosed with ASD and/or other developmental delays. Poor response to name may be a trait of the broader autism phenotype in infancy.


Author Affiliations: University of California Davis M.I.N.D. Institute, Sacramento (Drs Nadig, Ozonoff, Young, and Rogers); and University of California, Los Angeles (Ms Rozga and Dr Sigman).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Autism spectrum disorders: clinical and research frontiers
Caronna et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008;93:518-523.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recognition of Autism Before Age 2 Years
Johnson
Pediatr. Rev. 2008;29:86-96.
FULL TEXT  

Identification and Evaluation of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders
Johnson et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:1183-1215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

JournalWatch
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007;92:730-731.
FULL TEXT  

Autism: What's in a Name?
JWatch Pediatrics 2007;2007:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

Looking Ahead to Even More Discoveries in Autism Spectrum Disorder While Addressing Current Needs
Schonfeld and Manning-Courtney
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:412-413.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.