 |
 |

Effect of Booster Seat Laws on Appropriate Restraint Use by Children 4 to 7 Years Old Involved in Crashes
Flaura K. Winston, MD, PhD;
Michael J. Kallan, MS;
Michael R. Elliott, PhD;
Dawei Xie, PhD;
Dennis R. Durbin, MD, MSCE
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(3):270-275.
Objective To quantify the independent contribution of recently enacted booster seat laws on appropriate restraint use by child passengers in motor vehicles.
Design Longitudinal study of children involved in crashes with data collected via insurance claims records and a validated telephone survey.
Setting Sixteen states and Washington, DC, from December 1, 1998, through December 31, 2004.
Participants Probability sample of 5198 vehicles in crashes involving 6102 children aged 4 to 7 years, representing 78 159 vehicles and 91 752 children.
Main Exposures Booster seat law provisions, child age, state, and secular trends.
Main Outcome Measure Reported appropriate restraint use for this age group, including forward-facing child safety seats, belt-positioning booster seats, and combination seats.
Results Children aged 4 to 7 years in states with booster seat laws were 39% more likely to be reported as appropriately restrained than were children in other states (prevalence ratio [PR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.70). Children aged 4 to 5 years were 23% more likely (PR,1.23; 95% CI, 0.80-1.42) and children 6 to 7 years twice as likely (PR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.46-2.99) to be reported as appropriately restrained. For children aged 6 to 7 years, when compared with no law, laws through age 7 years were most effective (PR, 3.71; 95% CI, 2.49-5.42), followed by laws through age 4 or 5 years (PR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.89-2.24).
Conclusion Given the higher current use of age-appropriate restraints among children 4 to 5 years compared with older children, future upgrades to child restraint laws should include children through at least age 7 years to maximize the number of children properly restrained for their age.
Author Affiliations: Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (Drs Winston, Elliott, Xie, and Durbin and Mr Kallan); Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics (Dr Winston), Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Mr Kallan and Drs Xie and Durbin), and Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics (Dr Durbin), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia; and Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health (Dr Elliott), and Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan (Dr Elliott), Ann Arbor.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Effectiveness of Belt Positioning Booster Seats: An Updated Assessment
Arbogast et al.
Pediatrics 2009;124:1281-1286.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Booster seat laws and child fatalities: a case-control study
Farmer et al.
Inj. Prev. 2009;15:348-350.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A comparison of booster seat use in Canadian provinces with and without legislation
Snowdon et al.
Inj. Prev. 2009;15:230-233.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Working in the legislature: perspectives on injury prevention in the United States
Pollack et al.
Inj. Prev. 2009;15:208-211.
FULL TEXT
Effects of a Booster Seat Education and Distribution Program in Child Care Centers on Child Restraint Use Among Children Aged 4 to 8 Years
Thoreson et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:261-267.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Children With Special Health Care Needs: Patterns of Safety Restraint Use, Seating Position, and Risk of Injury in Motor Vehicle Crashes
Huang et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:518-523.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Determining the Proportion of Children Too Heavy for Age-Appropriate Car Seats in a Practice-Based Research Network
Basco et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2009;48:37-43.
ABSTRACT
|