You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 11, November 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Congenital Malaria in the United States

A Review of Cases From 1966 to 2005

Catherine R. Lesko, BA, MPH; Paul M. Arguin, MD; Robert D. Newman, MD, MPH

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(11):1062-1067.

Objectives  To provide an updated review and examine any trends among congenital malaria cases that might help guide diagnosis, treatment, and public health recommendations.

Design  Retrospective case series.

Setting  United States.

Participants  We reviewed all cases of congenital malaria reported to the US National Malaria Surveillance System between January 1, 1966, and December 31, 2004, including 1 unpublished case from 2005, encompassing all years for which data were collected and available.

Main Exposures  Maternal characteristics, including travel history, and malaria treatment.

Main Outcome Measure  Characteristics of congenitally acquired cases of malaria.

Results  For the 81 cases of congenital malaria reported in the United States in the past 40 years, the predominant infecting species was Plasmodium vivax (81%). Most mothers (96%) were foreign born, and 55 of 65 women (85%), for whom time of most recent exposure was known, were exposed 1 year or less before delivery. A common error in the treatment of infants with congenital malaria was the unnecessary administration of primaquine phosphate for P vivax infection.

Conclusions  Health care professionals should have heightened vigilance for malaria in pregnant women who have emigrated from or traveled to malaria-endemic areas within the past year, as well as in their offspring. Such women with episodes of fever during pregnancy should have a blood film to test for malaria performed promptly and should be treated appropriately. Treatment of a mother does not negate the need for heightened vigilance in her newborn. Health care professionals should be aware that congenital P vivax malaria does not need to be treated with primaquine.


Author Affiliations: Malaria Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.