You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 11, November 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Article
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Women's Health
 •Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Congenital Malaria in the United States

A Review of Cases From 1966 to 2005

Catherine R. Lesko, BA, MPH; Paul M. Arguin, MD; Robert D. Newman, MD, MPH

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(11):1062-1067.

Objectives  To provide an updated review and examine any trends among congenital malaria cases that might help guide diagnosis, treatment, and public health recommendations.

Design  Retrospective case series.

Setting  United States.

Participants  We reviewed all cases of congenital malaria reported to the US National Malaria Surveillance System between January 1, 1966, and December 31, 2004, including 1 unpublished case from 2005, encompassing all years for which data were collected and available.

Main Exposures  Maternal characteristics, including travel history, and malaria treatment.

Main Outcome Measure  Characteristics of congenitally acquired cases of malaria.

Results  For the 81 cases of congenital malaria reported in the United States in the past 40 years, the predominant infecting species was Plasmodium vivax (81%). Most mothers (96%) were foreign born, and 55 of 65 women (85%), for whom time of most recent exposure was known, were exposed 1 year or less before delivery. A common error in the treatment of infants with congenital malaria was the unnecessary administration of primaquine phosphate for P vivax infection.

Conclusions  Health care professionals should have heightened vigilance for malaria in pregnant women who have emigrated from or traveled to malaria-endemic areas within the past year, as well as in their offspring. Such women with episodes of fever during pregnancy should have a blood film to test for malaria performed promptly and should be treated appropriately. Treatment of a mother does not negate the need for heightened vigilance in her newborn. Health care professionals should be aware that congenital P vivax malaria does not need to be treated with primaquine.


Author Affiliations: Malaria Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Congenital Malaria in Calabar, Nigeria: The Molecular Perspective
Oduwole et al.
Am J Trop Med Hyg 2011;84:386-389.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.