You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 10, October 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Long-term Follow-up Data Collection and Use in State Newborn Screening Programs

Timothy Hoff, PhD; Maria Ayoob, MPH; Bradford L. Therrell, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(10):994-1000.

Objectives  To describe and analyze the types of data-related policies and practices that currently exist among state newborn screening (NBS) programs in relation to long-term follow-up (LTFU) and oversight for newborns with confirmed disorders.

Design  A 19-question online survey.

Participants  Thirty-five state NBS programs.

Main Outcome Measures  Whether LTFU is performed, collection and use of LTFU data, and variety of LTFU data collected.

Results  Survey findings reveal data-related challenges faced by state NBS programs in their ability to perform ongoing oversight, evaluation, and quality assurance with respect to LTFU for newborns with confirmed disorders. Of the NBS programs surveyed, 56% reported collecting no LTFU data. More than two-thirds of state NBS programs surveyed do not use LTFU data at all or use it only minimally. Most programs that collect any LTFU data from providers (physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals) do it through verbal communication or paper forms rather than electronically. Almost half of the programs collecting any LTFU data do so only once a year. A lot of variety exists in the types of LTFU data collected across programs. Most of the 15 programs that reported collecting LTFU data use it to track the clinical outcomes of patients, assess the needs of patients and their families for services, and track and identify individuals lost to follow-up across time.

Conclusion  The results generally point to a need for greater alignment of state NBS program data practices and policies with the data requirements for essential public health functions, such as quality assurance, program evaluation, and cost-benefit analysis.


Author Affiliations: Department of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, School of Public Health, State University of New York at Albany (Dr Hoff and Ms Ayoob); and National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center, Austin, Texas (Dr Therrell).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.