You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 10, October 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Child Development
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Effect of Block Play on Language Acquisition and Attention in Toddlers

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Dimitri A. Christakis, MD, MPH; Frederick J. Zimmerman, PhD; Michelle M. Garrison, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(10):967-971.

Objective  To test the hypotheses that block play improves language acquisition and attention.

Design  Randomized controlled trial.

Setting  Pediatric clinic.

Participants  Children aged 11/2 to 21/2 years.

Intervention  Distribution of 2 sets of building blocks.

Main Outcome Measures  Scores on the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, television viewing based on diary data, and the hyperactivity domain of the Child Behavior Checklist.

Results  Of 220 families approached in the clinic waiting room, 175 (80%) agreed to participate in the study. At least 1 diary was returned from 92 of the 175 families (53%). A total of 140 families (80%) completed exit interviews. Of the children in the intervention group, 52 (59%) had block play reported in their diaries compared with 11 (13%) in the control group (P < .01). The linear regression results for language acquisition were as follows: entire sample—raw score, 7.52 (P = .07); percentile, 8.4 (P = .15); low-income sample—raw score, 12.40 (P = .01); percentile, 14.94 (P = .03). For attention the results were as follows: entire sample—odds ratio, 0.49 (P = .29); low-income sample—odds ratio, 0.48 (P = .26) There were no statistically significant differences with respect to hyperactivity scores.

Conclusions  Distribution of blocks can lead to improved language development in middle- and low-income children. Further research is warranted.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Pediatrics (Drs Christakis and Zimmerman) and Health Services (Drs Christakis and Zimmerman) and Child Health Institute (Drs Christakis, Zimmerman, and Garrison), University of Washington, Seattle.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.