You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 9, September 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Immunization
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effect of Open Access Scheduling on Missed Appointments, Immunizations, and Continuity of Care for Infant Well-Child Care Visits

Mary E. O’Connor, MD, MPH; Bethany S. Matthews, MSPH; Dexiang Gao, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:889-893.

Objective  To examine the effect of open access scheduling (OA) on infant well-child care (WCC).

Design  Cluster randomization of 2 methods of OA compared with a baseline group (prior to OA).

Setting  Community health center pediatric clinic, August 1, 2003, to January 31, 2004.

Participants  Ten providers (pediatricians and physician assistants) and 878 infants; 2-, 4-, and 6-month WCC visits were scheduled.

Interventions  Two scheduling methods were compared under the OA model: the OA future visit group scheduled their infant's next WCC visit when leaving the visit, and the OA same day group called for a same-day appointment.

Main Outcome Measures  Missed appointment rates, on-time immunization rates, and continuity of care.

Results  Missed appointment rates decreased from 21% in the baseline group to 14% and 9% in the OA future visit and OA same day groups, respectively (P<.02). For 630 infants older than 5 months at study end, on-time immunization rates were 59% in the baseline group and 74% in both OA groups (P<.006). Of 412 infants with 2 or more WCC visits, 75% in the OA future visit group and 60% in the OA same day group saw the same provider for all visits (P = .001). This difference was due to differences among providers, not to the different scheduling methods.

Conclusion  Open access scheduling decreases missed appointments for infant WCC visits and appears to increase on-time immunizations.


Author Affiliations: Denver Health (Dr O’Connor and Ms Matthews), Departments of Pediatrics (Dr O’Connor) and Family Medicine (Ms Matthews), University of Colorado School of Medicine, and The Research Institute, The Children's Hospital (Dr Gao), Denver.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

So Much to Do, So Little Time: Care for the Socially Disadvantaged and the 15-Minute Visit
Fiscella and Epstein
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1843-1852.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care
Rosenthal
J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21:427-440.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Practical Barriers to Timely Primary Care Access: Impact on Adult Use of Emergency Department Services
Rust et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1705-1710.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Open access scheduling leads to fewer missed well-child visits
Kemp
AAP News 2006;27:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

Good News About Open-Access Scheduling
JWatch Pediatrics 2006;2006:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.