You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 7, July 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Review Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Diagnosis
 •Adolescent Medicine
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Psychiatry
 •Adolescent Psychiatry
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Improving Recognition of Adolescent Depression in Primary Care

Rachel A. Zuckerbrot, MD; Peter S. Jensen, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:694-704.

Objective  To address the following questions: (1) What evidence (ie, psychometric data collected in pediatric primary care, patient outcome data) exists for the various methods used to identify adolescent depression in primary care? and (2) What identification practices are currently in use?

Data Sources  We systematically searched MEDLINE for English-language articles using specific search terms and examined relevant titles, abstracts, and articles.

Study Selection  We reviewed 1743 MEDLINE abstracts. Seventy-four articles were pulled for examination, with 30 articles meeting full criteria.

Data Extraction  Five studies had adequate psychometric data on various adolescent depression identification methods in primary care. Only 1 compared the diagnostic accuracy of physicians trained to ask depression questions vs physicians trained in the use of a diagnostic aid. Six studies reported on current practice. Evidence regarding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was sought for question 1. Frequency of screening was sought for question 2.

Data Synthesis  Review of these articles found that few health care professionals use systematic depression identification methods, despite some growing evidence for their validity, feasibility, and possible efficacy.

Conclusion  Available evidence indicates that primary care professionals would improve their rates of depression diagnosis through training, but even more so by using adolescent symptom rating scales.


Author Affiliations: Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University and Center for the Advancement of Children's Mental Health, Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.


RELATED ARTICLE

Screens and Doors: The Management of Adolescent Depression in Primary Care
David A. Brent
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160(7):755-756.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Depression: Focus on the Adolescent Male
Breland and Park
American Journal of Men's Health 2008;2:87-93.
 

Guidelines for Adolescent Depression in Primary Care (GLAD-PC): I. Identification, Assessment, and Initial Management
Zuckerbrot et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:e1299-e1312.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med. 2007;12:95-96.
FULL TEXT  

Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, and Suicide Attempts Among Minority Adolescents: Ending the Silence
Bonomi and Kelleher
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:609-610.
FULL TEXT  

Adolescent Depression Screening in Primary Care: Feasibility and Acceptability
Zuckerbrot et al.
Pediatrics 2007;119:101-108.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screens and Doors: The Management of Adolescent Depression in Primary Care
Brent
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:755-756.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.