You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 4, April 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Injury Prevention & Control
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Injury Risk to Restrained Children Exposed to Deployed First- and Second-Generation Air Bags in Frontal Crashes

Kristy B. Arbogast, PhD; Dennis R. Durbin, MD, MSCE; Michael J. Kallan, MS; Michael R. Elliott, PhD; Flaura K. Winston, MD, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:342-346.

Objective  To estimate the risk of serious nonfatal injuries in frontal crashes among belted children seated in the right front seat of vehicles in which second-generation passenger air bags deployed compared with that of belted children seated in the right front seat of vehicles in which first-generation passenger air bags deployed.

Design and Setting  We enrolled a probability sample of 1781 seat belt–restrained occupants aged 3 through 15 years seated in the right front seat, exposed to deployed passenger air bags in frontal crashes involving insured vehicles in 3 large US regions, between December 1, 1998, and November 30, 2002. A telephone interview was conducted with the driver of the vehicle using a previously validated instrument. The study sample was weighted according to each subject’s probability of selection, with analyses conducted on the weighted sample.

Main Outcome Measure  Risk of serious injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥2 injuries and facial lacerations).

Results  The risk of serious injury for restrained children in the right front seat exposed to deployed second-generation passenger air bags was 9.9%, compared with 14.9% for similar children exposed to deployed first-generation passenger air bags (adjusted odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.97).

Conclusion  This study provides evidence based on field data that the risk of injury to children exposed to deploying second-generation passenger air bags is reduced compared with earlier designs.


Author Affiliations: Division of Emergency Medicine (Drs Arbogast and Durbin), Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics (Dr Winston), and The Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia (Drs Durbin and Elliott and Mr Kallan); and TraumaLink: The Interdisciplinary Pediatric Injury Control Research Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Drs Arbogast, Durbin, and Winston).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Second-Generation Air Bags Pose Lower Risk of Death for Children
McIntosh and Katcher
AAP Grand Rounds 2006;16:63-64.
FULL TEXT  

Association of First- and Second-Generation Air Bags with Front Occupant Death in Car Crashes: A Matched Cohort Study
Olson et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2006;164:161-169.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Translational research in child and adolescent transportation safety.
Simons-Morton and Winston
Eval Health Prof 2006;29:33-64.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.