You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 2, February 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (52)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Viral Infections
 •Sexually Transmitted Diseases
 •Adolescent Medicine
 •Immunization
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Parental Attitudes About Sexually Transmitted Infection Vaccination for Their Adolescent Children

Gregory D. Zimet, PhD; Rose M. Mays, RN, PhD; Lynne A. Sturm, PhD; April A. Ravert, MS; Susan M. Perkins, PhD; Beth E. Juliar, MA, MS

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:132-137.

Objectives  To evaluate parental attitudes about adolescent vaccination as a function of vaccine characteristics, including whether the vaccine prevented a sexually transmitted infection (STI), and to explore possible sociodemographic predictors of acceptability of STI vaccines.

Design  Participants were 278 parents who accompanied their children (69.1% female, aged 12-17 years) to appointments at medical clinics. By using computer-based questionnaires, parents rated 9 hypothetical vaccine scenarios, each of which was defined along 4 dimensions: mode of transmission (STI or non-STI), severity of infection (curable, chronic, or fatal), vaccine efficacy (50%, 70%, or 90%), and availability of behavioral methods for prevention (available or not available). Willingness by parents to vaccinate their adolescents under each vaccine scenario was assessed on a scale that ranged from 0 to 100. Conjoint analysis was used to determine the relative contribution of each dimension to the ratings.

Results  The mean vaccine scenario rating was 81.3. Sexually transmitted infection vaccines (mean, 81.3) were not rated differently than non-STI vaccines (mean, 80.0). Conjoint analysis indicated that severity of infection and vaccine efficacy had the strongest influence on ratings, followed by availability of behavioral prevention. Mode of transmission had a negligible effect on ratings. Child age (P = .08) and sex (P = .77), parent age (P = .32) and education (P = .34), insurance status (P = .08), and data collection site (P = .48) were not significantly associated with STI vaccine acceptability.

Conclusions  Parents were accepting of the idea of vaccinating their adolescent children against STIs. The most salient issues were severity of infection and vaccine efficacy, not sexual transmissibility. Parents also favored vaccines for infections that had no method of behavioral prevention available.


Author Affiliations: Department of Pediatrics (Drs Zimet and Sturm and Ms Ravert) and Section of Biostatistics (Dr Perkins and Ms Juliar), Indiana University School of Medicine; and Department of Family Health, Indiana University School of Nursing (Dr Mays), Indianapolis.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Parental Acceptability of Vaccines for Sexually Transmitted Infections
Susan L. Rosenthal and Lawrence R. Stanberry
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(2):190-192.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Mothers' Intention for Their Daughters and Themselves to Receive the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: A National Study of Nurses
Kahn et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:1439-1445.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Moral Justification for a Compulsory Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Program
Balog
Am. J. Public Health 2009;99:616-622.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

`What, Me Worry?': Parents' Reasons for Worry and Nonworry about Adolescent Risk for Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI)
Sturm et al.
J Health Psychol 2008;13:1060-1071.
ABSTRACT  

HPV and Cervical Cancer Testing and Prevention: Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes Among Hispanic Women
Vanslyke et al.
Qual Health Res 2008;18:584-596.
ABSTRACT  

Measuring the benefits of growth hormone therapy in children: a role for preference-based approaches?
Petrou and McIntosh
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008;93:95-97.
FULL TEXT  

Facilitating and understanding the family's choice of injection device for growth hormone therapy by using conjoint analysis
Ahmed et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008;93:110-114.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Delivering Adolescent Vaccinations in the Medical Home: A New Era?
Szilagyi et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:S15-S24.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adolescents' Access and Consent to the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: A Critical Aspect for Immunization Success
Farrell and Rome
Pediatrics 2007;120:434-437.
FULL TEXT  

American Cancer Society Guideline for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Use to Prevent Cervical Cancer and Its Precursors
Saslow et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:7-28.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A National Survey of Pediatrician Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Human Papillomavirus Vaccination
Daley et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:2280-2289.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mothers' Attitudes towards Preventing Cervical Cancer through Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: A Qualitative Study.
Waller et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1257-1261.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors That Are Associated With Parental Acceptance of Human Papillomavirus Vaccines: A Randomized Intervention Study of Written Information About HPV
Dempsey et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1486-1493.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The promise of the human papillomavirus vaccine does not confer immunity against ethical reflection.
de Melo-Martin
The Oncologist 2006;11:393-396.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Parental Acceptability of Vaccines for Sexually Transmitted Infections
Rosenthal and Stanberry
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:190-192.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.