You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 2, February 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Health Policy
 •Law and Medicine
 •Adolescent Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Parental Notification Laws for Minors’ Access to Contraception

What Do Parents Say?

Marla E. Eisenberg, ScD, MPH; Carolyne Swain, MS; Linda H. Bearinger, PhD, MS; Renee E. Sieving, PhD, RNC; Michael D. Resnick, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:120-125.

Background  Recent years have seen new challenges to laws protecting minors’ confidential access to reproductive health services. Little research has explored parental views on the issue.

Objective  To examine parents’ views about laws requiring parental notification (PNLs) when minor children seek to obtain prescription contraceptives, the exceptions parents would endorse, and the consequences they would expect.

Design  Fifteen-minute telephone surveys conducted in 2002.

Setting  Minnesota and Wisconsin.

Participants  Population-based sample of 1069 parents of adolescents aged 13 to 17 years with a working telephone number. An additional 1095 eligible parents declined and 360 were not available to participate.

Main Outcome Measures  Views about PNLs ("Do you think a law requiring notification of parents when a teen requests birth control from a clinic is a good idea, a bad idea, or neither a good nor a bad idea?").

Results  Of the eligible parents, 42.4% completed the survey. More than half (55.1%) of participants thought PNLs were a good idea. However, 96.1% of parents expected at least 1 negative consequence and 47.6% expected 5 or more negative consequences to result with the enactment of PNLs. For exceptions to PNLs, 85.5% of parents endorsed at least 1, and 29.7% endorsed 5 to 6. Each additional anticipated positive consequence of enacting PNLs was significantly associated with more than twice the odds of favoring PNLs (odds ratio [OR], 2.28), and each additional negative consequence was associated with lower odds of supporting PNLs (OR, 0.87). Likewise, each additional exception endorsed was associated with lower odds of supporting PNLs (OR, 0.71).

Conclusions  Many parents hold complex views on the need for confidentiality and the appropriate involvement of parents in adolescent health care services. Educating parents about the potential negative consequences of parental notification could change their support of PNLs.


Author Affiliations: Healthy Youth Development Prevention Research Center, Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health (Drs Eisenberg, Bearinger, Sieving, and Resnick), and Center for Adolescent Nursing, School of Nursing (Drs Bearinger and Sieving), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; and Title X/Region V Family Planning Training Program, MPRES, Inc, Milwaukee, Wis (Ms Swain).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Adolescent and parent perceptions on youth participation in risk behavior research.
Pasternak et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:1159-1166.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.