This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Correction  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery  • Audiology  • Pediatrics, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Donna R. Halloran, MD, MSPH; Terry C. Wall, MD, MPH; H. Hughes Evans, MD, PhD; J. Michael Hardin, PhD; Audie L. Woolley, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:949-955.

Objectives  To determine hearing screening failure rates in primary care settings and to examine the referral practices in response to an abnormal screening test.

Methods  We enrolled a convenience sample of children between 3 and 19 years of age who were undergoing hearing screening during a well-child visit. A failure was defined as missing any frequency (1000, 2000, or 4000 Hz) in either ear at 20-dB hearing level. The pediatrician made the decision of whether to refer the patient for further evaluation.

Results  Three academic and 5 private practices enrolled 1061 children. Sixty-seven children (7%) were unable to complete the screening. Of the 948 children who completed the screen, a total of 852 children (90%) passed the screening and 96 children (10%) failed. After multivariable logistic regression analysis, the only statistically significant factor predictive of a failed screen was developmental delay (P = .02). Of the 96 children who failed the hearing screening, 57 (59%) had no further evaluation, 12 (13%) were rechecked, and 27 (28%) were referred. Similar percentages were seen with children who could not be screened.

Conclusions  Although 10% of the children failed hearing screening, pediatricians neither rechecked nor referred more than half of these children. Screening that does not result in action for those failing the screening wastes resources and fails to properly identify hearing impairment in children.

Author Affiliations: Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Departments of Pediatrics (Drs Halloran, Wall, and Evans) and Surgery (Dr Woolley), University of Alabama at Birmingham; and Department of Information Systems, Statistics, and Management Science, University of Alabama at Tuscaloosa (Dr Hardin). Dr Halloran is now with the Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Mo.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Validity of Pure-Tone Hearing Screening at Well-Child Visits
Halloran et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:158-163.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measures of Follow-Up in Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs: A Need for Standardization
Mason et al.
AJA 2008;17:60-67.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quantitative and Qualitative Follow-Up Outcomes From a Preschool Audiologic Screening Program: Perspectives Over a Decade
Serpanos and Jarmel
AJA 2007;16:4-12.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT