 |
|
Enteral vs Intravenous Rehydration Therapy for Children With Gastroenteritis
A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Bob K. Fonseca, FRACP, MMed;
Anna Holdgate, FACEM, MMed;
Jonathan C. Craig, FRACP, PhD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:483-490.
Objective To review the relative efficacy and safety of enteral vs intravenous (IV) rehydration therapy in treating childhood gastroenteritis.
Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases were searched. Known investigators and expert bodies were contacted to locate unpublished and ongoing studies.
Study Selection Studies were selected based on the following criteria: randomized or quasi-randomized trials; children younger than 15 years with a clinical diagnosis of gastroenteritis of less than 1-week duration; interventions comprising enteral and IV treatment arms; and at least 1 of the following: major adverse event rates, treatment failure rates, weight gain with treatment, measurement of ongoing losses, length of hospital stay, costs of treatment, and satisfaction with treatment.
Data Extraction Data were extracted from eligible studies, which were then combined using a random-effects model.
Data Synthesis Sixteen trials involving 1545 children and conducted in 11 countries were identified. Compared with children treated with IV rehydration, children treated with oral rehydration had significantly fewer major adverse events, including death or seizures (relative risk, 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.89), and a significant reduction in length of hospital stay (mean, 21 hours; 95% CI, 8-35 hours). There was no difference in weight gain between the 2 groups (mean, –26 g; 95% CI, –61 to 10 g). The overall failure rate of enteral therapy was 4.0% (95% CI, 3.0%-5.0%).
Conclusions For childhood gastroenteritis, enteral rehydration is as effective if not better than IV rehydration. Enteral rehydration by the oral or nasogastric route is associated with significantly fewer major adverse events and a shorter hospital stay compared with IV therapy and is successful in most children.
From the Departments of Paediatrics (Dr Fonseca) and Emergency Medicine (Dr Holdgate), St George Hospital, New South Wales, Australia; and School of Public Health (Dr Craig), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
RELATED ARTICLE
Oral Rehydration: In Pediatrics, Less Is Often Better
James A. Taylor
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(5):420-421.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Acute gastroenteritis in children
Elliott
BMJ 2007;334:35-40.
FULL TEXT
Considerations in Assessing the Clinical Course and Severity of Rotavirus Gastroenteritis
D'Agostino
CLIN PEDIATR 2006;45:203-212.
JournalScan
Wyatt and Slater
Emerg. Med. J. 2005;22:190-191.
FULL TEXT
Oral Versus Intravenous Rehydration of Moderately Dehydrated Children: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Spandorfer et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:295-301.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
23 Apr 2004 to 23 Jul 2004
Evid. Based Nurs. 2004;7:e4-e4.
FULL TEXT
Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med. 2004;9:e5-e5.
FULL TEXT
Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med. 2004;9:159-160.
FULL TEXT
Enteral Rehydration Is the Best Way to Rehydrate Children with Gastroenteritis
JWatch General 2004;2004:3-3.
FULL TEXT
Oral Rehydration: In Pediatrics, Less Is Often Better
Taylor
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:420-421.
FULL TEXT
|
