You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 158 No. 4, April 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Immunization
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Effect of Choice of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine on Immediate Vaccination Pain in Infants

Moshe Ipp, MBBCh; Eyal Cohen, MD; Morton Goldbach, MD; Colin Macarthur, MBChB

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:323-326.

Objective  To compare acute pain response to 2 measles-mumps-rubella vaccines.

Design  Double-blind clinical trial.

Setting  Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.

Patients  Forty-nine infants 12 months of age receiving their first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination.

Interventions  Random allocation to receive Priorix or M-M-R II.

Main Outcome Measures  Pain responses before (baseline) and after (within 15 seconds) vaccination were quantified by visual analog scale (VAS; range, 0-100), completed by the parent and independently by the pediatrician, and the Modified Behavioral Pain Scale (range, 0-10), scored by a coder blinded to the vaccine allocation. Crying (yes or no) and latency to the first cry after injection were also measured.

Results  Twenty-six infants received Priorix and 23 received M-M-R II. There were no differences between the 2 groups in baseline characteristics or prevaccination baseline pain scores. Median pain scores after vaccination (Priorix vs M-M-R II) were as follows: pediatrician VAS, 15 vs 58 (P = .001); parent VAS, 22 vs 53 (P = .007); and Modified Behavioral Pain Scale, 6 vs 8 (P = .02). Median difference in pain scores (after minus before) for Priorix vs M-M-R II were as follows: pediatrician VAS, 15 vs 53 (P = .003); parent VAS, 22 vs 47 (P = .008); and Modified Behavioral Pain Scale, 3 vs 5 (P = .03). The median latency to first cry was 1.5 seconds in the Priorix group compared with 1 second in the M-M-R II group (P = .26).

Conclusions  Priorix vaccine causes significantly less pain than M-M-R II at the time of injection for 12-month-old infants receiving their first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination.


From the Division of Paediatric Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, and Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario. Dr Ipp was invited to present the results of this study at the 21st Annual Meeting of the European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases, April 9-11, 2003, as one of several speakers at a GlaxoSmithKline Vaccine Satellite Symposium. GlaxoSmithKline covered the cost of Dr Ipp's transportation and accommodation at the meeting and provided an honorarium of {euro}1600.


RELATED ARTICLE

Criteria for Choosing a Specific Vaccine
Gary L. Freed
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(4):311.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

EMLA Cream and Nitrous Oxide to Alleviate Pain Induced by Palivizumab (Synagis) Intramuscular Injections in Infants and Young Children
Carbajal et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e1591-e1598.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pain Reduction During Pediatric Immunizations: Evidence-Based Review and Recommendations
Schechter et al.
Pediatrics 2007;119:e1184-e1198.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

23 Apr 2004 to 23 Jul 2004
Evid. Based Nurs. 2004;7:e4-e4.
FULL TEXT  

Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med. 2004;9:e5-e5.
FULL TEXT  

Criteria for Choosing a Specific Vaccine
Freed
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:311-311.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.