 |
 |

Effect of Choice of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine on Immediate Vaccination Pain in Infants
Moshe Ipp, MBBCh;
Eyal Cohen, MD;
Morton Goldbach, MD;
Colin Macarthur, MBChB
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:323-326.
Objective To compare acute pain response to 2 measles-mumps-rubella vaccines.
Design Double-blind clinical trial.
Setting Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.
Patients Forty-nine infants 12 months of age receiving their first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination.
Interventions Random allocation to receive Priorix or M-M-R II.
Main Outcome Measures Pain responses before (baseline) and after (within 15 seconds) vaccination were quantified by visual analog scale (VAS; range, 0-100), completed by the parent and independently by the pediatrician, and the Modified Behavioral Pain Scale (range, 0-10), scored by a coder blinded to the vaccine allocation. Crying (yes or no) and latency to the first cry after injection were also measured.
Results Twenty-six infants received Priorix and 23 received M-M-R II. There were no differences between the 2 groups in baseline characteristics or prevaccination baseline pain scores. Median pain scores after vaccination (Priorix vs M-M-R II) were as follows: pediatrician VAS, 15 vs 58 (P = .001); parent VAS, 22 vs 53 (P = .007); and Modified Behavioral Pain Scale, 6 vs 8 (P = .02). Median difference in pain scores (after minus before) for Priorix vs M-M-R II were as follows: pediatrician VAS, 15 vs 53 (P = .003); parent VAS, 22 vs 47 (P = .008); and Modified Behavioral Pain Scale, 3 vs 5 (P = .03). The median latency to first cry was 1.5 seconds in the Priorix group compared with 1 second in the M-M-R II group (P = .26).
Conclusions Priorix vaccine causes significantly less pain than M-M-R II at the time of injection for 12-month-old infants receiving their first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination.
From the Division of Paediatric Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, and Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario. Dr Ipp was invited to present the results of this study at the 21st Annual Meeting of the European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases, April 9-11, 2003, as one of several speakers at a GlaxoSmithKline Vaccine Satellite Symposium. GlaxoSmithKline covered the cost of Dr Ipp's transportation and accommodation at the meeting and provided an honorarium of 1600.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Criteria for Choosing a Specific Vaccine
Gary L. Freed
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(4):311.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Order of Vaccine Injection and Infant Pain Response
Ipp et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:469-472.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A multifactorial strategy of pain management is associated with less pain in scheduled vaccination of children. A study realized by family practitioners in 239 children aged 4-12 years old
Boivin et al.
Fam Pract 2008;25:423-429.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
EMLA Cream and Nitrous Oxide to Alleviate Pain Induced by Palivizumab (Synagis) Intramuscular Injections in Infants and Young Children
Carbajal et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e1591-e1598.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pain Reduction During Pediatric Immunizations: Evidence-Based Review and Recommendations
Schechter et al.
Pediatrics 2007;119:e1184-e1198.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
23 Apr 2004 to 23 Jul 2004
Evid. Based Nurs. 2004;7:e4-e4.
FULL TEXT
Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med. 2004;9:e5-e5.
FULL TEXT
Criteria for Choosing a Specific Vaccine
Freed
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:311-311.
FULL TEXT
|