 |
|
Randomized Trial of a Parent Intervention
Parents Can Make a Difference in Long-term Adolescent Risk Behaviors, Perceptions, and Knowledge
Bonita Stanton, MD;
Matthew Cole, MA;
Jennifer Galbraith, PhD;
Xiaoming Li, PhD;
Sara Pendleton, MD;
Lesley Cottrel, PhD;
Sharon Marshall, MD;
Ying Wu, PhD;
Linda Kaljee, PhD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:947-955.
Background Although numerous interventions have been demonstrated to reduce targeted adolescent risk behaviors for brief periods, sustained behavior changes covering multiple risk behaviors have been elusive.
Objective To determine whether a parental monitoring intervention (Informed Parents and Children Together [ImPACT]) with and without boosters can further reduce adolescent truancy, substance abuse, and sexual risk behaviors and can alter related perceptions 24 months after intervention among youth who have all received an adolescent risk-reduction intervention, Focus on Kids (FOK).
Design Randomized, controlled, 3-celled longitudinal trial.
Setting Thirty-five low-income, urban community sites.
Participants Eight hundred seventeen African American youth aged 13 to 16 at baseline.
Intervention All youth participated in FOK, an 8-session, theory-based, small group, face-to-face risk-reduction intervention, 496 youth and parents received the 1-session ImPACT intervention (a videotape and discussion), 238 of the ImPACT youth also received four 90-minute FOK boosters delivered in small groups.
Main Outcome Measures Responses at baseline and 24 months after intervention to a questionnaire assessing risk and protective behaviors and perceptions. Analyses used General Linear Modeling, intraclass correlation coefficient, analysis of covariance, and multiple comparisons with least significant difference test adjustment.
Results After adjusting for the intraclass correlation coefficient, 6 of 16 risk behaviors were significantly reduced (P .05) among youth receiving ImPACT compared with youth who only received FOK (respectively, mean number of days suspended, 0.65 vs 1.17; carry a bat as a weapon, 4.1% vs 9.6%; smoked cigarettes, 12.5% vs 22.7%; used marijuana, 18.3% vs 26.8%; used other illicit drugs, 1.4% vs 5.6%; and, asked sexual partner if condom always used, 77.9% vs 64.9%). Four of the 7 theory-based subscales reflected significant protective changes among youth who received ImPACT. ImPACT did not produce any significant adverse effects on behaviors or perceptions.
Conclusion A parent monitoring intervention can significantly broaden and sustain protection beyond that conferred through an adolescent risk-reduction intervention.
Author Affiliations: Departments of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, Detroit (Drs Stanton, Li, Pendleton, and Marshall, and Mr Cole), University of Maryland, Baltimore (Drs Galbraith and Kaljee), and West Virginia University, Morgantown (Drs Cottrel and Wu).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
A Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Response to the HIV/AIDS Crisis Among Blacks in the United States, 1981-2009
Sutton et al.
AJPH 2009;99:S351-S359.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Exploring Implementation and Fidelity of Evidence-Based Behavioral Interventions for HIV Prevention: Lessons Learned From the Focus on Kids Diffusion Case Study
Galbraith et al.
Health Educ Behav 2009;36:532-549.
ABSTRACT
A longitudinal examination of risky sexual behaviors among Canadian and Italian adolescents: Considering individual, parental, and friend characteristics
P. et al.
International Journal of Behavioral Development 2009;33:265-276.
ABSTRACT
Effects Through 24 Months of an HIV/AIDS Prevention Intervention Program Based on Protection Motivation Theory Among Preadolescents in the Bahamas
Gong et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:e917-e928.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Child Victimization and Parental Monitoring as Mediators of Youth Problem Behaviors
Robertson et al.
Criminal Justice and Behavior 2008;35:755-771.
ABSTRACT
Reduction in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Risk Among Youth in Developing Countries
Deveaux et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:1130-1139.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Development and Validation of a Parental Monitoring Instrument: Measuring How Parents Monitor Adolescents' Activities and Risk Behaviors
Cottrell et al.
The Family Journal 2007;15:328-335.
ABSTRACT
Are parents aware that their children are overweight or obese?: Do they care?
He and Evans
cfp 2007;53:1493-1499.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Role of Parental Monitoring in Adolescent Health Outcomes: Impact on Regimen Adherence in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes
Ellis et al.
J Pediatr Psychol 2007;32:907-917.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Family Socialization of Adolescent's Self-Reported Cigarette Use: The Role of Parents' History of Regular Smoking and Parenting Style
Foster et al.
J Pediatr Psychol 2007;32:481-493.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Best-Evidence Interventions: Findings From a Systematic Review of HIV Behavioral Interventions for US Populations at High Risk, 2000-2004
Lyles et al.
AJPH 2007;97:133-143.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Parental Rules and Monitoring of Children's Movie Viewing Associated With Children's Risk for Smoking and Drinking
Dalton et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:1932-1942.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Role of Health Care Providers in the Prevention of Overweight and Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents
Stender et al.
Diabetes Spectr. 2005;18:240-248.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
