You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 158 No. 10, October 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Adolescent Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Randomized Trial of a Parent Intervention

Parents Can Make a Difference in Long-term Adolescent Risk Behaviors, Perceptions, and Knowledge

Bonita Stanton, MD; Matthew Cole, MA; Jennifer Galbraith, PhD; Xiaoming Li, PhD; Sara Pendleton, MD; Lesley Cottrel, PhD; Sharon Marshall, MD; Ying Wu, PhD; Linda Kaljee, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:947-955.

Background  Although numerous interventions have been demonstrated to reduce targeted adolescent risk behaviors for brief periods, sustained behavior changes covering multiple risk behaviors have been elusive.

Objective  To determine whether a parental monitoring intervention (Informed Parents and Children Together [ImPACT]) with and without boosters can further reduce adolescent truancy, substance abuse, and sexual risk behaviors and can alter related perceptions 24 months after intervention among youth who have all received an adolescent risk-reduction intervention, Focus on Kids (FOK).

Design  Randomized, controlled, 3-celled longitudinal trial.

Setting  Thirty-five low-income, urban community sites.

Participants  Eight hundred seventeen African American youth aged 13 to 16 at baseline.

Intervention  All youth participated in FOK, an 8-session, theory-based, small group, face-to-face risk-reduction intervention, 496 youth and parents received the 1-session ImPACT intervention (a videotape and discussion), 238 of the ImPACT youth also received four 90-minute FOK boosters delivered in small groups.

Main Outcome Measures  Responses at baseline and 24 months after intervention to a questionnaire assessing risk and protective behaviors and perceptions. Analyses used General Linear Modeling, intraclass correlation coefficient, analysis of covariance, and multiple comparisons with least significant difference test adjustment.

Results  After adjusting for the intraclass correlation coefficient, 6 of 16 risk behaviors were significantly reduced (P≤.05) among youth receiving ImPACT compared with youth who only received FOK (respectively, mean number of days suspended, 0.65 vs 1.17; carry a bat as a weapon, 4.1% vs 9.6%; smoked cigarettes, 12.5% vs 22.7%; used marijuana, 18.3% vs 26.8%; used other illicit drugs, 1.4% vs 5.6%; and, asked sexual partner if condom always used, 77.9% vs 64.9%). Four of the 7 theory-based subscales reflected significant protective changes among youth who received ImPACT. ImPACT did not produce any significant adverse effects on behaviors or perceptions.

Conclusion  A parent monitoring intervention can significantly broaden and sustain protection beyond that conferred through an adolescent risk-reduction intervention.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, Detroit (Drs Stanton, Li, Pendleton, and Marshall, and Mr Cole), University of Maryland, Baltimore (Drs Galbraith and Kaljee), and West Virginia University, Morgantown (Drs Cottrel and Wu).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Child Victimization and Parental Monitoring as Mediators of Youth Problem Behaviors
Robertson et al.
Criminal Justice and Behavior 2008;35:755-771.
ABSTRACT  

Reduction in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Risk Among Youth in Developing Countries
Deveaux et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:1130-1139.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development and Validation of a Parental Monitoring Instrument: Measuring How Parents Monitor Adolescents' Activities and Risk Behaviors
Cottrell et al.
The Family Journal 2007;15:328-335.
ABSTRACT  

Are parents aware that their children are overweight or obese?: Do they care?
He and Evans
cfp 2007;53:1493-1499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Parental Monitoring in Adolescent Health Outcomes: Impact on Regimen Adherence in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes
Ellis et al.
J Pediatr Psychol 2007;32:907-917.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Family Socialization of Adolescent's Self-Reported Cigarette Use: The Role of Parents' History of Regular Smoking and Parenting Style
Foster et al.
J Pediatr Psychol 2007;32:481-493.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Best-Evidence Interventions: Findings From a Systematic Review of HIV Behavioral Interventions for US Populations at High Risk, 2000-2004
Lyles et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2007;97:133-143.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Parental Rules and Monitoring of Children's Movie Viewing Associated With Children's Risk for Smoking and Drinking
Dalton et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:1932-1942.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Health Care Providers in the Prevention of Overweight and Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents
Stender et al.
Diabetes Spectr. 2005;18:240-248.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.