This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (8)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice  • Law and Medicine  • Medical Practice, Other  • Neonatology and Infant Care  • Pregnancy and Breast Feeding  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Diane J. Madlon-Kay, MD; Terese A. DeFor, MS; Susan Egerter, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:579-583.

Objective  To describe newborn length of stay, postdischarge follow-up, and health care utilization in the context of Minnesota's early discharge legislation.

Design and Setting  Retrospective study using claims data from a large managed care organization.

Participants  Term newborns born from January 1995 through February 1999 (N = 22 944).

Outcome Measures  Newborn length of stay, home or clinic visits within 1 week of discharge (early follow-up), immunizations completed by age 3 months, readmissions within 1 month of discharge, and urgent care or emergency department visits within 2 months of discharge.

Results  After enactment of Minnesota's early discharge legislation in 1996, the percentage of newborns with short stays (0-1 days after vaginal birth or 2-3 days after cesarean birth) decreased from 52% to 16% for vaginally born infants and from 87% to 63% for cesarean-born infants (P = .001). Although the legislation mandated coverage for home visits after short stays, only 12.4% of short-stay newborns had early home visits. Overall, 50% of infants had early home or clinic follow-up; compared with those who did not receive early follow-up, these infants were more likely to have complete immunizations (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.14), urgent care or emergency department visits (adjusted OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.39), and readmissions (adjusted OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 2.02-3.08).

Conclusions  Although implementation of Minnesota's early discharge legislation corresponded with significantly increased lengths of stay, very few short-stay infants received the postdischarge care for which coverage was mandated. Our findings indicate, however, that infants at higher risk for adverse outcomes were appropriately identified to receive early follow-up.

From the Ramsey Family and Community Medicine Residency Program, St Paul, Minn (Dr Madlon-Kay); HealthPartners Research Foundation, Bloomington, Minn (Ms DeFor); and the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Egerter).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Preventable Newborn Readmissions Since Passage of the Newborns' and Mothers' Health Protection Act
Paul et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:2349-2358.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Unstudied infants: outcomes of moderately premature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit
Escobar et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006;91:F238-F244.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Maternal Postpartum Health Care Utilization and the Effect of Minnesota Early Discharge Legislation
Madlon-Kay and DeFor
J Am Board Fam Med 2005;18:307-311.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Postnatal Home Nursing Visits for Prevention of Hospital Care for Jaundice and Dehydration
Paul et al.
Pediatrics 2004;114:1015-1022.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT