 |
|
Improving Participation in Chlamydia Screening Programs
Perspectives of High-Risk Youth
Diane R. Blake, MD;
Margaret H. Kearney, PhD, RNC;
J. Michael Oakes, PhD;
Susan K. Druker, MA;
Roger Bibace, PhD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:523-529.
Background Many young people at highest risk for chlamydial infection do not use chlamydia screening services.
Objectives To describe young people's beliefs and opinions about obstacles to and motivators for obtaining testing and to provide recommendations for how to improve youth participation in chlamydia screening programs.
Methods Eight focus group interviews (4 male and 4 female groups) were conducted with young people using a semistructured interview guide. Thirty-two male and 23 female volunteers (mean age, 18.2 years; age range, 15-24 years) were recruited from Job Corps and Department of Youth Services sites. The main outcome measure was categorization of textual data using content analysis techniques. Data were coded by 2 investigators into categories of responses based on research questions and spontaneously offered comments. Satisfactory intercoder agreement was achieved.
Results Participants described many obstacles to testing, including concern that someone will know they were tested or tested positive, fear about discovering they have a sexually transmitted disease, and fear of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Many participants were unsure what physical effects chlamydia produced or thought it was possible to die of a chlamydial infection. Participants recommended providing more information about the effects of chlamydia, availability of urine testing, and ease of treatment to motivate more young people to seek testing. They also emphasized the need to make sexually transmitted disease screening services more private and confidential. There was an overwhelming interest in using a home Chlamydia test (much like a home pregnancy test) if one were available.
Conclusions To increase youth participation in screening programs, it will be necessary to address their concerns, dispel misconceptions, and provide more information about chlamydia. A home Chlamydia test might be one way to increase screening.
From the Departments of Pediatrics (Dr Blake) and Medicine (Ms Druker), University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester; William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Mass (Dr Kearney); Division of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Dr Oakes); and Frances L. Hiatt School of Psychology, Clark University, Worcester (Dr Bibace).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Detecting, Preventing, and Treating Sexually Transmitted Diseases Among Adolescent Arrestees: An Unmet Public Health Need
Belenko et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2009;99:1032-1041.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Approaches to Chlamydia Screening: One Size Does Not Fit All
Blake
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:585-586.
FULL TEXT
"It has to speak to people's everyday life...": qualitative study of men and women's willingness to participate in a non-medical approach to Chlamydia trachomatis screening
Lorimer et al.
Sex. Transm. Infect. 2009;85:201-205.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Correlates of Readiness to Receive Chlamydia Screening Among 2 Populations of Youths
Blake et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:1088-1094.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
HIV Testing Among Young Adults in the United States: Associations with Financial Resources and Geography
Nguyen et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2006;96:1031-1034.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Other articles noted: 25 Jul 03 to 7 Nov 03
Evid. Based Nurs. 2004;7:e1-1.
FULL TEXT
|
