You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 157 No. 5, May 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Immunization
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Effectiveness of Assessment and Referral on Immunization Coverage in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children

Susan H. Ashkar, MA; Loring G. Dales, MD; Francisco Averhoff, MD, MPH; Abigail Shefer, MD; Jeffrey Higa, MPH; Lisa Thompson, MPH; Judy Gomez, MPH, RD; Denise C. Gee, MPH, RD; Eric L. Hurwitz, DC, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:456-462.

Background  The use of immunization assessment and referral (A/R) in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) has been shown to produce dramatic improvements in vaccination coverage when coupled with parental incentive; however, data are lacking to support the use of A/R alone.

Objective  To determine the effectiveness of A/R in increasing immunization coverage among WIC participants.

Design  Participating WIC centers were assigned to1 of 3 interventions that delivered A/R of varying frequency or a control group.

Setting  Twenty of the largest Public Health Foundation Enterprises–WIC centers in Los Angeles County.

Participants  Children continuously enrolled in participating WIC centers from 6 to 24 months of age.

Intervention  Assessment of child's vaccination status followed by referral to a health care provider for those lacking indicated vaccinations.

Main Outcome Measure  Up-to-date (UTD) status at 24 months of age for all recommended vaccines.

Results  Baseline coverage rates were similar among all study sites (overall, 77% UTD). After the study period, compared with the controls (88% UTD), we found no differences in immunization coverage among WIC centers that administered A/R at every visit (every 2 months) to all children (90% UTD; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.94), every 6 months to all children (89% UTD; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.62-1.56), or every visit to children found to be behind at 8 months of age (89% UTD; OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.48-1.68).

Conclusion  In this urban population of WIC children with high baseline immunization coverage, A/R was not effective in increasing immunization coverage.


From the Department of Health Services, Public Health, Immunization Program, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (Mss Ashkar and Thompson and Mr Higa); the Department of Health Services, Immunization Branch, State of California, Berkeley (Dr Dales); the National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga (Drs Averhoff and Shefer); Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, Irwindale, Calif (Mss Gomez and Gee); and the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (Dr Hurwitz). Mr Higa is now with the Department of Health Services, Infectious Diseases Branch, State of California, Gardena; Ms Thompson, the Center for Healthier Children, Families and Communities, University of California, Los Angeles.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.