You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 157 No. 4, April 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Patient-Physician Relationship, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Postpartum Interviews

Factors Affecting Patients' Learning and Satisfaction

Ximena L. Valdes, MD; Mirzada Kurbasic, MD; Barbara S. Whitfill; Daniel I. Sessler, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:327-330.

Background  Interview setting and technique presumably alter efficacy of the postpartum interview. It is commonly believed that interviews are most effective when both parties are positioned at the same physical level.

Objective  To test the hypothesis that women's satisfaction and learning are improved when postpartum visits are conducted by pediatricians sitting in a chair rather than standing and are further improved when female pediatricians sit on the mother's bed.

Design  Randomized double-blind study.

Setting  University hospital newborn nursery.

Subjects  Seventy-five mothers on their first postpartum day. Patients' postpartum interviews were conducted by physicians assigned randomly to (1) sitting on the edge of the bed near the mother's feet, (2) sitting in a chair near the side of the bed, or (3) standing at the foot of the bed.

Main Outcome Measures  Within 60 minutes of completing the interview, an investigator (B.S.W.), blinded to physician position, asked each mother questions related to her satisfaction with the interview and the information that she was given. Differences among position groups were compared by means of 1-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis, {chi}2, or Fisher exact tests; P<.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results  Potential confounding factors were similar among patients assigned to each of the 3 interview positions. The estimated duration of the interviews, the degree of satisfaction, and information retention were similar in each group.

Conclusion  Physicians need not make special efforts to conduct postpartum interviews in a seated position.


From the Department of Pediatrics (Drs Valdes and Kurbasic), Children and Youth Project (Ms Whitfill), and Outcomes Research Institute and Department of Anesthesiology (Dr Sessler), University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky; and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (Dr Sessler).


RELATED ARTICLE

Interpreting Negative Results: Postpartum Interview Position Not Associated With Improved Outcomes
Iris R. Mabry, Tracy Richmond, Adriana Bialostozky, and Jerry Rushton
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(4):333-335.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Interpreting Negative Results: Postpartum Interview Position Not Associated With Improved Outcomes
Mabry et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003;157:333-335.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.