You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 157 No. 11, November 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Anesthesia
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Deep Sedation With Propofol by Nonanesthesiologists

A Prospective Pediatric Experience

Egidio Barbi, MD; Tania Gerarduzzi, MD; Federico Marchetti, MD; Elena Neri, MD; Elena Verucci, MD; Irene Bruno, MD; Stefano Martelossi, MD; Giulio Zanazzo, MD; Armando Sarti, MD; Alessandro Ventura, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:1097-1103.

Background  The need to perform procedural sedation for children has increased in recent years, and so has the experience of nonanesthesiologists in this field. The use of propofol increases the success of satisfactory deep sedation, but it can produce rapid and profound decreases in level of consciousness and cardiorespiratory function. Data are needed to assess the safety of this drug outside an anesthesiology setting.

Objective  To assess safety and efficacy of procedural sedation with propofol in a pediatric ward of a tertiary-care pediatric teaching hospital with trained personnel and monitoring facilities.

Methods  Patients admitted to the hospital who needed invasive procedures underwent procedural sedation by the pediatric sedation unit with intravenous propofol. A training protocol was developed to educate nurses and residents.

Results  We performed 1059 procedures. Sedation was achieved in all procedures, and all but 1 were successfully performed. No patient required intubation. Transient desaturation resolving spontaneously occurred in 134 (12.7%) of 1059 patients. Major desaturation requiring a short course of ventilation occurred in 4 (0.8%) of 483 patients undergoing upper endoscopies, in 1 (0.3%) of 287 patients undergoing painful procedures, and in none of the 289 patients undergoing colonoscopies. Laryngospasm occurred in 10 (2.1%) of 483 patients undergoing upper endoscopies.

Conclusions  In this experience, the use of propofol with concurrent oxygen administration allowed sedations in children with no significant complications for colonoscopies and painful procedures. Complications in the group of upper endoscopies appear too high for recommending propofol in a sedation unit with residents in attendance. This protocol of procedural sedation by nonanesthesiologists allowed a significant increase in the number of procedures performed with sedation and saved anesthesiology resources.


From the Clinica Pediatrica (Drs Barbi, Gerarduzzi, Marchetti, Neri, Verucci, Bruno, and Ventura), Servizio di Gastroenterologia (Dr Martelossi), Servizio di Emato-Oncologia (Dr Zanazzo), and Servizio di Anestesia e Rianimazione (Dr Sarti), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Burlo Garofolo, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Propofol-based sedation regimen for infants and children undergoing ambulatory magnetic resonance imaging
Machata et al.
Br J Anaesth 2008;101:239-243.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Propofol Sedation: Intensivists' Experience With 7304 Cases in a Children's Hospital
Vespasiano et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:e1411-e1417.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Age and Sedative Agent on the Accuracy of Bispectral Index in Detecting Depth of Sedation in Children
Malviya et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:e461-e470.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Propofol With Pentobarbital/Midazolam/Fentanyl Sedation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain in Children
Pershad et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:e629-e636.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chloral Hydrate Sedation for Pediatric Echocardiography: Physiologic Responses, Adverse Events, and Risk Factors
Heistein et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:e434-e441.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Observational and Objective Measures to Differentiate Depth of Sedation in Children from Birth to 18 Years of Age
Malviya et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2006;102:389-394.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Electrophysiologic Monitors With Clinical Assessment of Level of Sedation
Chisholm et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:46-52.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bispectral Index as a Guide for Titration of Propofol During Procedural Sedation Among Children
Powers et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:1666-1674.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

General Anesthesia in Infants and Children for Pediatric Dermatologic Procedures: Is It Worth It?
Dinulos and Cravero
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:629-630.
FULL TEXT  

Review of Pediatric Sedation
Cravero and Blike
Anesth. Analg. 2004;99:1355-1364.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.