You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 157 No. 11, November 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (47)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pain
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Kangaroo Care Is Effective in Diminishing Pain Response in Preterm Neonates

C. Celeste Johnston, DEd, RN; Bonnie Stevens, PhD, RN; Janet Pinelli, DNS, RN; Sharyn Gibbins, PhD, RN; Francoise Filion, MS, RN; Anne Jack, MS, RN; Susan Steele, RN; Kristina Boyer, MSc(A), RN; Annie Veilleux, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:1084-1088.

Objective  To test the efficacy of maternal skin-to-skin contact, or kangaroo care (KC), on diminishing the pain response of preterm neonates to heel lancing.

Design  A crossover design was used, in which the neonates served as their own controls.

Subjects  Preterm neonates (n = 74), between 32 and 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and within 10 days of birth, who were breathing without assistance and who were not receiving sedatives or analgesics in 3 level II to III neonatal intensive care units in Canada.

Interventions  In the experimental condition, the neonate was held in KC for 30 minutes before the heel-lancing procedure and remained in KC for the duration of the procedure. In the control condition, the neonate was in the prone position in the isolette. The ordering of conditions was random.

Main Outcome Measures  The primary outcome was the Premature Infant Pain Profile, which is composed of 3 facial actions, maximum heart rate, and minimum oxygen saturation changes from baseline in 30-second blocks. Videotapes, taken with the camera positioned on the neonate's face so that an observer could not tell whether the neonate was being held or was in the isolette, were coded by research assistants who were naïve to the purpose of the study. Heart rate and oxygen levels were continuously monitored into a computer for later analysis. A repeated-measures analysis of covariance was used, with order of condition and site as factors and severity of illness as a covariate.

Results  Premature Infant Pain Profile scores across the first 90 seconds from the heel-lancing procedure were significantly (.002<P<.04) lower by 2 points in the KC condition.

Conclusions  For preterm neonates who are 32 weeks' postmenstrual age or older, KC seems to effectively decrease pain from heel lancing. Further study is needed to determine if younger neonates or those requiring assistance in breathing, or older infants or toddlers, would benefit from KC, or if it would remain effective over several procedures. Given its effectiveness, and that parents of neonates in critical care units want to participate more in comforting their children, KC is a potentially beneficial strategy for promoting family health.


From the School of Nursing, McGill University (Dr Johnston, Mr Filion, and Ms Boyer), and the Department of Neonatology, Hopital Sainte Justine (Dr Veilleux), Montreal, Quebec; Faculty Nursing, University of Toronto (Dr Stevens and Ms Jack), the Department of Nursing, Hospital for Sick Children (Dr Stevens and Ms Boyer), and Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre (Dr Gibbins), Toronto, Ontario; and Department of Neonatology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (Dr Pinelli and Ms Steele).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Prenatal Visit
Cohen and Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Fam
Pediatrics 2009;124:1227-1232.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Review of CAM for Procedural Pain in Infancy: Part II. Other Interventions
Tsao et al.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2008;5:399-407.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Impact of Adult Behaviors and Vocalizations on Infant Distress during Immunizations
Blount et al.
J Pediatr Psychol 2008;33:1163-1174.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Behavioral Approaches to Anxiety and Pain Management for Pediatric Venous Access
Cohen
Pediatrics 2008;122:S134-S139.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Love, Pain, and Intensive Care
Anand and Hall
Pediatrics 2008;121:825-827.
FULL TEXT  

International Perspectives: Skin-to-skin Contact: A Paramount Contribution to the Modern Neonatal Paradigm
Martinez
NeoReviews 2007;8:e55-e57.
FULL TEXT  

Prevention and Management of Pain in the Neonate: An Update
American Academy of Pediatrics et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:2231-2241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Added Benefit of Kangaroo Care: Diminished Pain
JWatch Pediatrics 2004;2004:6-6.
FULL TEXT  

Pain in Children
JWatch General 2004;2004:7-7.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.