This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on ISI (3)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Primary Care/ Family Medicine  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Héla Makni, MD, MSc; Jennifer L. O'Loughlin, PhD; Michèle Tremblay, MD; André Gervais, MD, FRCPC; Chantal Lacroix, MD, MSc; Véronique Déry, MD, MSc; Gilles Paradis, MD, MSc, FRCPC

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:1263-1267.

Background  Primary care physicians are potentially important sources of interventions aimed at preventing youth smoking. Yet recent surveys suggest that physician smoking prevention practices are less than optimal.

Objectives  To document prevention counseling practices and to identify correlates of these activities in a random sample of general practitioners in Montreal, Quebec.

Methods  A cross-sectional mail survey.

Results  Of 440 eligible general practitioners (GPs), 337 (77%) completed the questionnaire. General practitioners were more likely to ascertain the smoking status of adolescents (70.9%) than preadolescents (35.7%). Although about half of the GPs offered advice to prevent smoking onset in young adults (48.6%) and adolescents (48.3%), fewer did so for preadolescents (34.4%); only 12.1% advised parents to discuss smoking onset with their children. Correlates of ascertaining smoking status included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-3.41), lower proportion of walk-in patients (OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.31-5.80), awareness of the "stage of behavior change'' model (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.18-4.04), and higher self-efficacy (OR, 4.12, 95% CI, 2.00-8.69). Correlates of provision of prevention advice included more hours spent in direct patient care (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.13-3.34), favorable beliefs and attitudes (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.06-2.83), and higher self-efficacy (OR, 4.32; 95% CI, 2.25-8.44).

Conclusions  Our results point to the need for renewed efforts to enhance preventive efforts in primary care settings. Intervention programs for GPs should emphasize overcoming unfavorable beliefs and attitudes and low self-efficacy. Future research should evaluate the effect of brief prevention counseling adapted to increasingly busy practices.

From Direction de la Santé Publique de Montréal-Centre (Drs Makni, O'Loughlin, Tremblay, Gervais, Lacroix, Déry, and Paradis), Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University (Drs O'Loughlin and Paradis), Division of Preventive Medicine, McGill University Health Center (Drs Tremblay, Gervais, Lacroix, Déry, and Paradis), Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal, (Dr Déry), and Agence d'Evaluation des Technologies et des Modes d'Interventions en santé (Dr Déry), Montreal, Quebec.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?