This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (17)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Randomized Controlled Trial  • Emergency Medicine  • Gastroenterology  • Gastrointestinal Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Yvonne C. Atherly-John, MD; Sandra J. Cunningham, MD; Ellen F. Crain, MD, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:1240-1243.

Background  Physicians report several barriers to the use of oral rehydration therapy (ORT) for dehydration in children due to acute gastroenteritis.

Objectives  To compare ORT with intravenous therapy for the treatment of moderate dehydration in children with acute gastroenteritis and to determine whether the factors reported as barriers to the use of ORT would be substantiated in practice.

Methods  Randomized controlled trial in an urban pediatric emergency department. Children with moderate dehydration due to acute gastroenteritis were randomly assigned to ORT (group 1) or intravenous therapy (group 2). The primary outcome was length of stay in the emergency department. Secondary outcomes included hospital admission rate, staff time, relapse after discharge from the hospital, and parental satisfaction. Two days after discharge, parents were surveyed by telephone to assess the relapse and their satisfaction with the visit.

Results  Eighteen patients were enrolled in group 1 and 16 in group 2. The mean length of stay in group 1 was 225 vs 358 minutes in group 2 (P<.01). Mean staff time was 35.8 minutes in group 1 compared with 65 minutes in group 2 (P = .03). Three patients failed ORT and required intravenous therapy. Two patients (11%) in group 1 vs 4 (25 %) in group 2 required admission to the hospital (P = .20). No patients relapsed after being discharged from the hospital. Fourteen parents (77%) in group 1 compared with 6 (37.5%) in group 2 reported that they were highly satisfied with all aspects of the visit (P = .01).

Conclusions  Reported barriers to ORT were not supported by our data. Moreover, ORT performed better than intravenous therapy on all measured outcomes.

From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Oral Rehydration Therapy: Reverse Transfer of Technology
Mathuram Santosham
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(12):1177-1179.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Predictors of Outcomes in Pediatric Enteritis: A Prospective Cohort Study
Freedman et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:e9-e16.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oral Versus Intravenous Rehydration of Moderately Dehydrated Children: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Spandorfer et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:295-301.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enteral vs Intravenous Rehydration Therapy for Children With Gastroenteritis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Fonseca et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:483-490.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intravenous therapy
Waitt et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2004;80:1-6.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

In children with moderate dehydration, oral rehydration reduced ED stay and staff time compared with intravenous rehydration
Klassen and Hartling
Evid. Based Med. 2003;8:116-116.
FULL TEXT  

Oral Rehydration Therapy for Children Is Faster and As Effective As IV Therapy
JWatch Emergency Med. 2002;2002:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

Oral Rehydration Therapy: Reverse Transfer of Technology
Santosham
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:1177-1179.
FULL TEXT