 |
|
A Randomized Trial of Oral vs Intravenous Rehydration in a Pediatric Emergency Department
Yvonne C. Atherly-John, MD;
Sandra J. Cunningham, MD;
Ellen F. Crain, MD, PhD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:1240-1243.
Background Physicians report several barriers to the use of oral rehydration therapy (ORT) for dehydration in children due to acute gastroenteritis.
Objectives To compare ORT with intravenous therapy for the treatment of moderate dehydration in children with acute gastroenteritis and to determine whether the factors reported as barriers to the use of ORT would be substantiated in practice.
Methods Randomized controlled trial in an urban pediatric emergency department. Children with moderate dehydration due to acute gastroenteritis were randomly assigned to ORT (group 1) or intravenous therapy (group 2). The primary outcome was length of stay in the emergency department. Secondary outcomes included hospital admission rate, staff time, relapse after discharge from the hospital, and parental satisfaction. Two days after discharge, parents were surveyed by telephone to assess the relapse and their satisfaction with the visit.
Results Eighteen patients were enrolled in group 1 and 16 in group 2. The mean length of stay in group 1 was 225 vs 358 minutes in group 2 (P<.01). Mean staff time was 35.8 minutes in group 1 compared with 65 minutes in group 2 (P = .03). Three patients failed ORT and required intravenous therapy. Two patients (11%) in group 1 vs 4 (25 %) in group 2 required admission to the hospital (P = .20). No patients relapsed after being discharged from the hospital. Fourteen parents (77%) in group 1 compared with 6 (37.5%) in group 2 reported that they were highly satisfied with all aspects of the visit (P = .01).
Conclusions Reported barriers to ORT were not supported by our data. Moreover, ORT performed better than intravenous therapy on all measured outcomes.
From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
RELATED ARTICLE
Oral Rehydration Therapy: Reverse Transfer of Technology
Mathuram Santosham
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(12):1177-1179.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Oral Versus Intravenous Rehydration of Moderately Dehydrated Children: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Spandorfer et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:295-301.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Enteral vs Intravenous Rehydration Therapy for Children With Gastroenteritis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Fonseca et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:483-490.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Intravenous therapy
Waitt et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2004;80:1-6.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
In children with moderate dehydration, oral rehydration reduced ED stay and staff time compared with intravenous rehydration
Klassen and Hartling
Evid. Based Med. 2003;8:116-116.
FULL TEXT
Oral Rehydration Therapy for Children Is Faster and As Effective As IV Therapy
JWatch Emergency Med. 2002;2002:2-2.
FULL TEXT
Oral Rehydration Therapy: Reverse Transfer of Technology
Santosham
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:1177-1179.
FULL TEXT
|
