You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 11, November 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Infant Colic

Empirical Evidence of the Absence of an Association With Source of Early Infant Nutrition

Tammy J. Clifford, PhD; M. Karen Campbell, PhD; Kathy N. Speechley, PhD; Fabian Gorodzinsky, MD, FRCPC

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:1123-1128.

Background  The etiology of infant colic remains unknown, despite an abundance of research on the topic.

Objective  To determine whether breastfeeding has a protective effect in colic's development.

Design  A prospective cohort study of 856 mother-infant dyads. Eligible participants included English-speaking adult residents of a region in Ontario, who gave birth, at term, to a live singleton whose birth weight was appropriate for gestational age. Self-administered questionnaires, mailed to mothers at 1 and 6 weeks post partum, requested information on several infant and maternal factors, including source of infant nutrition (exclusively breastfed, complementary fed, and exclusively formula fed). Cases of colic were identified by applying modified Wessel criteria to data recorded in the Barr Baby Day Diary or by interpreting responses to the Ames Cry Score.

Main Outcome Measures  Prevalence of colic among breastfed, formula-fed, and complementary-fed infants; and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) reflecting the prevalence of colic among formula- and complementary-fed infants relative to those who were breastfed.

Results  Of 856 mothers, 733 (86%) completed the first questionnaire and 617 (72%) completed the second questionnaire. Overall, the prevalence of colic at 6 weeks was 24%. No association was seen between the source of infant nutrition and colic's development. In multivariate analyses, higher levels of maternal trait anxiety (AOR, 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.54), maternal alcohol consumption at 6 weeks (AOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.03-2.40), and shift work during pregnancy (AOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.73-2.21) were associated with an increased likelihood of colic, after controlling for feeding method, maternal age, and parity. In these same analyses, being married or having a common-law partner (AOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.87) and being employed full-time during pregnancy (AOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.32-1.14) were associated with a reduced likelihood of colic.

Conclusions  Breastfeeding did not have a protective effect on the development of colic. Although colic was statistically associated with several variables, including preexisting maternal anxiety, much of colic's etiology remains unexplained.


From the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs Clifford, Campbell, and Speechley), Paediatrics (Drs Campbell, Speechley, and Gorodzinsky), and Obstetrics & Gynecology (Dr Campbell), The University of Western Ontario; Child Health Research Institute and Lawson Health Research Institute (Drs Campbell, Speechley, and Gorodzinsky), London; and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa (Dr Clifford).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Infantile colic, maternal smoking and infant feeding at 5 weeks of age
Canivet et al.
Scand J Public Health 2008;36:284-291.
ABSTRACT  

Factors Influencing Full Breastfeeding in a Southwestern Ontario Community: Assessments at 1 Week and at 6 Months Postpartum
Clifford et al.
J Hum Lact 2006;22:292-304.
ABSTRACT  

Effect of a Low-Allergen Maternal Diet on Colic Among Breastfed Infants: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Hill et al.
Pediatrics 2005;116:e709-e715.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sleep-Related Nighttime Crying (Yonaki) in Japan: A Community-Based Study
Fukumizu et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:217-224.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

SCHIP's Impact In Three States: How Do The Most Vulnerable Children Fare?
Dick et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:63-75.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Who's Enrolled in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)? An Overview of Findings From the Child Health Insurance Research Initiative (CHIRI)
Brach et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:e499-507.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sequelae of Infant Colic: Evidence of Transient Infant Distress and Absence of Lasting Effects on Maternal Mental Health
Clifford et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:1183-1188.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.