You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 3, March 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ophthalmological Disorders
 •Pediatric Ophthalmology
 •Screening
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Evidence for Changing Guidelines for Routine Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity

Shoo K. Lee, MBBS, FRCPC, PhD; Charles Normand, BA, DPhil; Douglas McMillan, MD, FRCPC; Arne Ohlsson, MD, FRCPC, MSc; Michael Vincer, MD, FRCPC; Christopher Lyons, MBBS, FRCSC; for the Canadian Neonatal Network

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:387-395.

Context  Existing guidelines recommended by the Canadian Pediatric Society (CPS) and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) for routine screening for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) remain controversial.

Objective  To determine whether current guidelines for routine screening for ROP should be changed.

Design  We examined data that were collected as part of a larger study of 14 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Canada. We examined the effect of strategies using different birth weight (BW) and gestational age (GA) criteria for routine ROP screening, and performed a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Setting  The 14 NICUs (except one) are regional tertiary level referral centres serving geographic regions of Canada, and include approximately 60% of all tertiary-level NICU beds in Canada.

Patients  This large cohort included all 16 424 infants admitted to 14 Canadian NICUs from January 8, 1996, to October 31, 1997.

Interventions  None.

Main Outcome Measure  Treatment for ROP.

Results  The most cost-effective strategy was to routinely screen only infants having a BW of 1200 g or less. This included all infants treated for ROP (except 1 outlier at 32 weeks GA and 1785 g BW), at a marginal cost per additional person with improved vision of $513 081 for screening patients between 28 weeks GA and 1200 g BW, compared with $1 800 039 and $2 075 874 for using the current AAP and CPS guidelines, respectively (cryotherapy outcomes). Results for laser therapy were similar, but costs were slightly lower. This strategy reduced the number of infants screened under the current CPS guidelines by 46%.

Conclusion  Screening only infants having a BW of 1200 g or less is the most cost-effective strategy for routine ROP screening.


From the Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, and the Centre for Community Health and Health Evaluation Research,Vancouver, British Columbia (Dr Lee); the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England (Dr Normand); the Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Alberta (Dr McMillan); the Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Ontario (Dr Ohlsson); the Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia (Dr Vincer); and the Department of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia (Dr Lyons).

Corresponding author and reprints: Shoo K. Lee, MBBS, FRCPC, PhD, Canadian Neonatal Network, Canadian Neonatal Network Coordinating Centre, 4480 Oak St, Room E-414, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3V4 (e-mail: shool{at}interchange.ubc.ca).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Characteristics of severe retinopathy of prematurity patients in China: a repeat of the first epidemic?
Chen and Li
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:268-271.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

UK population based study of severe retinopathy of prematurity: screening, treatment, and outcome
Haines et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F240-f244.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Characteristics of Infants With Severe Retinopathy of Prematurity in Countries With Low, Moderate, and High Levels of Development: Implications for Screening Programs
Gilbert et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:e518-e525.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Inhaled Nitric Oxide for the Management of Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn
Lorch et al.
Pediatrics 2004;114:417-426.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Causes of severe visual impairment and blindness in children in Ethiopia
Vedantham and Ratnagiri
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1432-1432.
FULL TEXT  

Retinopathy of prematurity: recent advances in our understanding
Wheatley et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002;87:F78-82.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Retinopathy of prematurity: recent advances in our understanding
Wheatley et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:696-700.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of the Hyperoxic Test and the Alternate Breath Test in Infants
BOUFERRACHE et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002;165:206-210.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.