You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 12, December 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Asthma
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Allergy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Metered-Dose Inhaler

The Emergency Department Orphan

Irene Tien, MD; David Dorfman, MD; Beth Kastner, MPH; Howard Bauchner, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:1335-1339.

Objective  Physicians providing emergency department care to children primarily use nebulizers for the delivery of bronchodilators and these physicians have misconceptions regarding the advantages and disadvantages of using metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) with a spacer (MDI + S) for acute asthma exacerbations.

Design  Self-administered mail survey.

Setting  Emergency department.

Participants  Emergency medicine section members of the American Academy of Pediatrics and Canadian Pediatric Society.

Interventions  Bronchodilator delivery methods in acute pediatric asthma.

Main Outcome Measures  The 2 principal outcomes for bivariate analysis were self-reported nebulizer use in all patients and MDI + S use in patients with mild acute asthma.

Results  Of eligible physicians, 333 (51%) of 567 responded. The majority were dual trained in pediatrics and pediatric emergency medicine (72%) and practiced full time (83%) in an urban (83%) pediatric emergency department (80%). The most commonly cited advantages of MDIs were their cost (33%) and speed of use (28%). The most commonly cited disadvantages were patient or parent dissatisfaction (24%) and relative ease of nebulizer use (23%). Only 10% to 21% of participants used MDIs in the emergency department and reserved this delivery method for children with mild asthma exacerbations. There were no significant associations between selected respondent demographic variables and the use of MDIs.

Conclusions  Misconceptions regarding the efficacy and safety of MDI + S for the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations exist but are limited to a minority of surveyed emergency medicine physicians caring for children. Nebulizers remain the preferred method of routine bronchodilator delivery by physicians providing care to pediatric asthmatics in the emergency department.


From the Divisions of Pediatric Emergency Medicine and General Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.

Corresponding author and reprints: Irene Tien, MD, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 1 Boston Medical Center Place, Maternity 6, Boston, MA 02118 (e-mail: irene.tien{at}bmc.org).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Paediatric acute asthma management in Australia and New Zealand: practice patterns in the context of clinical practice guidelines
Babl et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008;93:307-312.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preventing Unnecessary Emergency Department Visits for "Albuterol Nebs"
Schmitt et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:626-626.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.