You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 154 No. 7, July 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Educational Intervention
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Objective Structured Clinical Examination

A Step in the Direction of Competency-Based Evaluation

Carol Carraccio, MD; Robert Englander, MD, MPH

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:736-741.

Background  The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education is embarking on the major task of a paradigm shift in graduate education in the direction of competency-based medical education and evaluation of outcomes. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), a measure of clinical competence that focuses on outcomes via observable behaviors, is gaining national recognition.

Objective  To review the pediatric literature relevant to the OSCE.

Method  A MEDLINE search from the date of the original report of the OSCE (1975) to the present was performed. All English-language studies regarding the use of the OSCE in pediatric education published in the United States and Great Britain were reviewed.

Main Outcome Measures  Reliability and validity of the OSCE were examined. Use of standardized pediatric patients was discussed.

Results  A greater number of stations and similarity between tasks at different stations increased the reliability of the OSCE. A greater number of stations increased sampling of material and content validity. Correlation between the OSCE and precertification examinations ranged between 0.59 and 0.71, with P<=.01. Correlation between the OSCE and monthly clinical evaluations was much lower (0.39-0.57), but still statistically significant at P<=.05. Gaps between expected and actual performance were documented. Overall, the experience of being a standardized patient was viewed as positive by children and their parents.

Conclusions  With appropriate attention to design, acceptable reliability and validity can be achieved for the OSCE. Significant correlations between the OSCE and precertification examinations as well as monthly clinical evaluations were found, the former being stronger than the latter. We conclude that the combination of the OSCE, standardized board examinations, and direct observation in the clinical setting has the potential to become the "gold standard" for measuring physician competence.


From the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Assessing Dental Students' Competence: Best Practice Recommendations in the Performance Assessment Literature and Investigation of Current Practices in Predoctoral Dental Education
Albino et al.
J Dent Educ 2008;72:1405-1435.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Continuity-Structured Clinical Observations: Assessing the Multiple-Observer Evaluation in a Pediatric Resident Continuity Clinic
Zimmer et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e1633-e1645.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Using children as standardised patients for assessing clinical competence in paediatrics
Tsai
Arch. Dis. Child. 2004;89:1117-1120.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The State of Pediatrics Residency Training: A Period of Transformation of Graduate Medical Education
Sectish et al.
Pediatrics 2004;114:832-841.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reference Standards, Judges, and Comparison Subjects: Roles for Experts in Evaluating System Performance
Hripcsak and Wilcox
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2002;9:1-15.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.