You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 154 No. 7, July 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

How Far Have State Medicaid Agencies Advanced in Performance Measurement for Children?

Margaret A. McManus, MHS; Regina R. Graham, BA; Harriette B. Fox, MSS; Catherine M. Mercil, MSPH, RN; Charles E. Irwin Jr, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:665-671.

Background  While children represent the largest population group enrolled in Medicaid managed care, little is known about the pediatric performance measures used by state Medicaid agencies.

Objective  To identify Medicaid managed care requirements for using Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set and other performance measures for children (defined as those aged 0-21 years in this study).

Design  A structured telephone survey of pediatric performance measures.

Participants  Survey respondents were state Medicaid officials responsible for managed care quality oversight in 39 states.

Main Outcome Measures  Percentage of states in 1998 with effectiveness-of-care measures on health promotion and disease prevention, early detection and screening, and acute and chronic illness; with use measures on preventive care, ambulatory care, pharmacy, inpatient hospital care, and mental health and chemical dependency services; and with access measures on primary care, low-birth-weight neonates delivered at appropriate facilities, and dental care.

Results  In 1998, state Medicaid agencies placed most of their emphasis on monitoring preventive care for children, with immunization rates being the primary focus. Far less attention was directed at assessing the treatment of acute illness. Although more than half of states monitored the treatment of chronic childhood conditions, they focused exclusively on asthma and selected mental health diagnoses.

Conclusions  States are still in the initial phases of designing and implementing quality oversight systems for Medicaid-insured children. Additional quality reporting requirements are clearly needed to assess the treatment of acute and chronic illness among children along with more age-specific reporting requirements.


From the Maternal & Child Health Policy Research Center, Washington, DC (Mss McManus, Graham, and Fox); Catherine Mercil Consulting, Arlington, Va (Ms Mercil); and the Division of Adolescent Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Irwin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.