 |
|
Antibiotic Treatment of Children With Unsuspected Meningococcal Disease
Vincent J. Wang, MD;
Richard Malley, MD;
Gary R. Fleisher, MD;
Stanley H. Inkelis, MD;
Nathan Kuppermann, MD, MPH
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:556-560.
Background Data from an earlier study suggest that patients with unsuspected meningococcal disease (UMD) cannot be differentiated easily from febrile children with viral syndromes on the basis of physical examinations or peripheral blood counts. Some children with meningococcal disease therefore are treated inadvertently as outpatients.
Objective To determine whether antibiotic therapy administered at the outpatient visit prevents complications, permanent sequelae, or death in children with UMD.
Methods We reviewed the medical records of patients younger than 20 years with invasive meningococcal disease at 7 pediatric referral centers from January 1, 1981, through December 31, 1996. Patients were considered to have UMD if they underwent evaluation and discharge as outpatients and if blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid cultures obtained at evaluation yielded Neisseria meningitidis. We compared the frequency of development of complications (meningitis, sepsis, and pericarditis), permanent sequelae (limb amputation, skin grafting, and persistent neurologic disability) or death between patients who did and did not receive antibiotics at the outpatient visits.
Results Of 58 children with UMD, 19 (33%) received antibiotics and 39 (67%) did not. Complications occurred significantly less frequently in the antibiotic-treated group (7/19 [37%] vs 27/39 [69%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.81; P=.03). There was no significant difference in death or permanent sequelae between groups (0/19 vs 3/39 [8%]; OR, 0; 95% CI, 0-2.61; P=.54). There was insufficient power, however, to exclude the possibility of a clinically meaningful difference between the groups with regard to these latter outcomes.
Conclusions Antibiotic administration to young patients with UMD at the time of the outpatient visit is associated with a reduction in complications from this disease. Although the routine use of antibiotics in febrile outpatients younger than 20 years cannot be advocated, empirical treatment should be considered in the setting of higher probability of meningococcal disease.
From the Divisions of Emergency Medicine (Drs Wang, Malley, and Fleisher) and Infectious Diseases (Dr Malley), Department of Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; the Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Harbor–University of Califoria–Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance (Dr Inkelis); and the Division of Emergency Medicine, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of California–Davis School of Medicine (Dr Kuppermann).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Reprogramming the Host Response in Bacterial Meningitis: How Best To Improve Outcome?
van der Flier et al.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003;16:415-429.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Evaluation of Young Febrile Children for Occult Bacteremia: Time to Reevaluate Our Approach?
Kuppermann
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:855-857.
FULL TEXT
Extremity Pain and Refusal to Walk in Children With Invasive Meningococcal Disease
Inkelis et al.
Pediatrics 2002;110:e3-3.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Incidence of Unsuspected Meningococcal Disease
Press et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:741-741.
FULL TEXT
Managing Children with Unsuspected Meningococcal Disease
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2000;2000:11-11.
FULL TEXT
|
