You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 154 No. 5, May 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Public Health, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

How Well Does the Questionnaire for Identifying Children With Chronic Conditions Identify Individual Children Who Have Chronic Conditions?

Ruth E. K. Stein, MD; Laurie J. Bauman, PhD; Susan G. Epstein, MSW; Jane D. Gardner, DSc; Deborah Klein Walker, EdD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:447-452.

Background  The Questionnaire for Identifying Children With Chronic Conditions (QuICCC) is an instrument based on a conceptual noncategorical definition that uses parental responses to identify children with chronic conditions for epidemiological purposes.

Objectives  To determine whether the QuICCC is sufficiently valid, sensitive, and specific to be used to identify individual children as having a chronic condition or disability; whether parents are accurate enough that their answers to QuICCC items can be accepted as valid; and what kinds of errors in classification occur when the QuICCC is used to identify children with chronic conditions.

Methods  The sample consisted of 424 children who were patients of 9 physicians in separate practice settings throughout New England. Each physician was briefly trained in the conceptual definition on which the QuICCC is based and then was asked to identify 25 children in his or her practice who met the definition and 25 children who did not meet the definition. The QuICCC was administered to the parents of these children by blinded interviewers via telephone. The QuICCC classification was compared with physician categorization. Discrepant cases were then followed up by asking physicians and parents to answer the original questions a second time.

Results  Complete data were available on 379 (89.4%) of 424 children. There was agreement on 89% ({kappa}=0.78). The sensitivity was 94%; specificity, 83%; positive predictive value, 86%; and negative predictive value, 92%. Of the 42 discordant cases, 30 parent reports on the QuICCC qualified the child as having a chronic condition when the physician classified the child as being without such a condition. Fewer (n=12) discrepancies occurred because physicians identified children with chronic conditions that the QuICCC failed to identify. When the questions were readministered at follow-up, physicians corrected errors in rating in 9 cases; mothers changed their answers in 5 instances. In 13 instances the issues were known to both parties and appeared to arise in the "gray zone" or boundary area, where there was disagreement over whether a particular child qualified using the theoretical definition. For 11 children identified as having a chronic condition only by the parent's responses to the QuICCC, physician report appeared to be inaccurate primarily due to the physician's lack of information. In 3 cases where the physician reported the child to have a chronic condition, but the parent did not, the physician appeared to be correct. Follow-up data were incomplete on 1 child.

Conclusions  These data support the validity of parent-generated information for the evaluation of health status. Although these findings should be replicated, this study suggests that the QuICCC may be applicable also as a screening tool for individual child identification, provided that several sources of error are considered.


From the Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (Drs Stein and Bauman); New England SERVE, Boston, Mass (Ms Epstein and Drs Gardner and Walker); Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, Mass (Dr Gardner); and the Massachusetts Health Department, Boston (Dr Walker).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Health Among Caregivers of Children With Health Problems: Findings From a Canadian Population-Based Study
Brehaut et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2009;99:1254-1262.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Definitions and Measurement of Chronic Health Conditions in Childhood: A Systematic Review
van der Lee et al.
JAMA 2007;297:2741-2751.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identification of Children With Special Health Care Needs Within a Managed Care Setting
Rolnick et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003;157:273-278.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Functional Disability and School Activity Limitations in 41 300 School-Age Children: Relationship to Medical Impairments
Msall et al.
Pediatrics 2003;111:548-553.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Shortening the Questionnaire for Identifying Children With Chronic Conditions: What Is the Consequence?
Stein et al.
Pediatrics 2001;107:e61-e61.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.