You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 154 No. 4, April 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Educational Intervention
 This Article
 •Full text
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Pediatric Resident and Faculty Knowledge of the Denver II

Michelle S. Barratt, MD, MPH; Virginia A. Moyer, MD, MPH

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:411-413.

Objective  To assess knowledge of the Denver II, the revised developmental screening tool recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, in residents and faculty, and to evaluate a teaching intervention for incoming postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) trainees.

Design  A cross-sectional test of knowledge for all subjects and pretesting and posttesting of the incoming PGY-1 trainees.

Setting  University of Texas–Houston Medical School Department of Pediatrics.

Participants  Faculty (n=9) and residents (n=78), including an intervention group (n=45), of incoming PGY-1 trainees over 2 years.

Interventions  Postgraduate year 1 trainees in both 1994 through 1995 and 1995 through 1996 viewed the Denver II training videotape on entry into a continuity clinic. Trainees were encouraged to perform Denver II evaluations on at least 1 appropriate patient at each pediatric clinic session and had access to Denver II support materials.

Main Outcome Measures  Scores on the Denver II Proficiency Written Test, self-reported measures of comfort, and number of Denver II evaluations performed.

Results  The mean (SD) test scores for incoming, preintervention PGY-1 trainees (n=45) (41.3 [9.6]) did not differ from scores for outgoing PGY-1 trainees (n=13) (38.5 [10.4]) who had not received the intervention. Postintervention PGY-1 test results were significantly improved (59.4 [10.6]) (P<.001). Test scores for upper-level residents who had participated in the developmental pediatrics rotation (n=14) were better (55.3 [9.3]), but all scored below passing. Residents who had not yet participated in the developmental pediatrics rotation (n=19) and members of the general pediatric faculty (n=9) had scores similar to those of PGY-1 trainees (40.9 [13.4] and 39.0 [15.1], respectively).

Conclusions  Residents had a greater knowledge of the Denver II after completing a developmental pediatrics rotation. Our intervention produced significant improvement in PGY-1 trainees' knowledge, raising it to levels similar to those of upper-level residents exposed to developmental pediatrics. Faculty were not expert in using the Denver II.


From the Department of Pediatrics, Divisions of Community and General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (Dr Barratt), and the Division of Community and General Pediatrics and the Center for Population Health and Evidence-Based Medicine (Dr Moyer), University of Texas–Houston Medical School, Houston.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Predictive Value of Sequential Electroencephalogram (EEG) in Neonates With Seizures and Its Relation to Neurological Outcome
Khan et al.
J Child Neurol 2008;23:144-150.
ABSTRACT  

Recognition and Management of Pediatric Fractures by Pediatric Residents
Ryan et al.
Pediatrics 2004;114:1530-1533.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.