You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 153 No. 8, August 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (71)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carriage in a Child Care Center Following a Case of Disease

Rita Shahin, MD, MHSc, CCFP, FRCPC; Ian L. Johnson, MD, MSc, FRCPC; Frances Jamieson, MD, FRCPC; Alison McGeer, MD, MSc, FRCPC; Jonathan Tolkin, MD, FRCPC; E. Lee Ford-Jones, MD, FRCPC; for the Toronto Child Care Center Study Group

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:864-868.

Objectives  To study the prevalence of methicillin sodium–resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus colonization in a child care center following the diagnosis of community-acquired methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) disease in a previously well 2-year-old attendee and to determine the optimal site of detection of S aureus.

Design  Point prevalence survey and questionnaire administration.

Setting  A Toronto, Ontario, child care center.

Interventions  Parents were provided with general information. Consenting parents completed a questionnaire and permitted screening of their child at 1 or more of throat, nose, and perianal sites. Families of children who were culture positive for MRSA were offered screening and suppressive therapy. Nasal and perianal swabs were obtained from child care center staff and screened.

Results  Of 201 children, 164 (81.6%) had completed questionnaires and had undergone screening at 1 or more sites; 38 staff members (100%) completed questionnaires and were screened. A 26-month-old classroom contact with chronic dermatitis had MRSA detected only on perianal swab. Of 3 adult household contacts of the index case and 2 adult and 1 child contacts of the classroom contact, only the 7-year-old sibling of the classroom contact was positive for MRSA. By pulse-field gel electrophoresis, these isolates were identical and not related to any of the common strains circulating in regional health care institutions. Of 40 children with S aureus (24.4%), 33 had cultures at 3 sites, of which the throat was more sensitive (22 [67%]) than the nostrils (15 [46%]) or perianal sites (8 [24%]). There was a tendency for higher carriage of S aureus in children with certain risk factors, including personal hospitalization (prevalence ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-12.1), family member hospitalization (prevalence ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-6.6), and visiting the hospital emergency department (prevalence ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-14.5), all in the previous 6 months.

Conclusions  To our knowledge, this is one of the first recognized cases of MRSA disease and apparent transmission in a child care center. Throat and perianal site screenings have a higher sensitivity in identifying children colonized with S aureus than nasal culturing. Infection with MRSA should be suspected in disease unresponsive to standard antibiotic therapy.


From the Toronto Public Health Department (Drs Shahin and Johnson), the Ontario Ministry of Health Central Public Health Laboratory (Dr Jamieson), Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai Hospital (Dr McGeer), Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children (Dr Ford-Jones), Department of Pediatrics, North York General Hospital (Dr Tolkin), and the Departments of Community Medicine (Drs Shashin and Johnson), Microbiology (Dr McGeer), and Pediatrics (Drs Tolkin and Ford-Jones), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Sensitivities of Nasal and Rectal Swabs for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in an Active Surveillance Program
Currie et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008;46:3101-3103.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intrafamilial Spread of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections
Bloom
JAMA 2008;299:2511-2511.
FULL TEXT  

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections among healthy full-term newborns
James et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93:F40-F44.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Daum
NEJM 2007;357:380-390.
FULL TEXT  

Community-associated MRSA: Superbug at our doorstep
Hawkes et al.
CMAJ 2007;176:54-56.
FULL TEXT  

Risk Factors and Molecular Analysis of Community Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carriage
Lu et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:132-139.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Southern New England Children
Dietrich et al.
Pediatrics 2004;113:e347-e352.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Community- and Health Care-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Naimi et al.
JAMA 2003;290:2976-2984.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Related Clones Containing SCCmec Type IV Predominate among Clinically Significant Staphylococcus epidermidis Isolates
Wisplinghoff et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003;47:3574-3579.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections in 2 Pediatric Outpatients
Feder
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:560-562.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.