You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 153 No. 6, June 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Educational Intervention
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

A Pediatric Clinical Skills Assessment Using Children as Standardized Patients

J. Lindsey Lane, MD; Amitai Ziv, MD; John R. Boulet, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:637-644.

Objectives  To develop and implement a pediatric clinical skills assessment (PCSA) for residents, using children as standardized patients (SPs); to assess the psychometric adequacy of the PCSA and use it to evaluate the performance of residents; and to evaluate the feasibility of using child SPs and the response of the residents and the child SPs to participation in the PCSA.

Methods  Ten 22-minute complete patient encounters were developed, 7 with child SPs. Fifty-six residents (10 second-year pediatric residents, 29 first-year pediatric residents, and 17 first-year family practice residents) were evaluated on the following clinical skills: history taking, physical examination, interpersonal skills, and documentation and interpretation of clinical data/patient note.

Main Outcome Measures  Patient encounter checklists, focus groups, and questionnaires.

Results  Average skill scores for the 56 residents were 68% (SD, 12%) for history taking, 56% (SD, 26%) for physical examination, 46% (SD, 12%) for patient note, and 68% (SD, 16%) for interpersonal skills. Second-year pediatric residents scored significantly higher on history taking than first-year pediatric and first-year family practice residents; first-year pediatric residents scored significantly higher on interpersonal skills than second-year pediatric and first-year family practice residents; and first- and second-year pediatric residents scored significantly higher on the patient note component than first-year family practice residents. All differences noted were significant at P<.05. There were no significant differences on physical examination between the groups. Reliabilities were 0.69 for history taking, 0.64 for physical examination, 0.76 for interpersonal skills, and 0.81 for the patient note component. On a Likert scale (5 indicates high; 1, low), residents rated the PCSA 3.9 for realism, 4.1 for challenge, 3.1 for enjoyment, and 2.9 for fairness. Child SPs found the experience positive. No negative effects on the children were identified by their real parents or their SP parents.

Conclusions  Our development method gives content validity to our PCSA, and resident scores give indication of PCSA construct validity. Reliabilities are in the acceptable range. Residents found the PCSA challenging and realistic but less than enjoyable and fair. Use of child SPs is feasible. Resident performance scores were low relative to the performance criteria of the PCSA development group. The adequacy of clinical skills teaching and assessment in residency programs needs to be reviewed. Deficits in specific skills and overall performance of residents identified by a PCSA could be used to guide individual remediation and curricular change.


From the Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University (Dr Lane), and the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (Dr Boulet), Philadelphia, Pa; and Department of Pediatrics, Hadassah, Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (Dr Ziv). Dr Lane is now with the Department of Pediatrics, Jefferson Medical College, Children's Health Center, Philadelphia.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Virtual Child: Evaluation of an Internet-Based Pediatric Behavior Management Simulation
Boynton et al.
J Dent Educ 2007;71:1187-1193.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Using children as standardised patients for assessing clinical competence in paediatrics
Tsai
Arch. Dis. Child. 2004;89:1117-1120.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Simulation in Medical Education: A Review
Lane et al.
Simulation Gaming 2001;32:297-314.
ABSTRACT  

Improving Medical Care: The Use of Simulation Technology
Streufert et al.
Simulation Gaming 2001;32:164-174.
ABSTRACT  

The Objective Structured Clinical Examination: A Step in the Direction of Competency-Based Evaluation
Carraccio and Englander
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:736-741.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effective Evaluation of Residency Education: How Do We Know It When We See It?
Siegel and Greenberg
Pediatrics 2000;105:964-965.
FULL TEXT  

Structured Clinical Observations: A Method to Teach Clinical Skills With Limited Time and Financial Resources
Lane and Gottlieb
Pediatrics 2000;105:973-977.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.