 |
|
After-hours Telephone Triage and Advice in Private and Nonprivate Pediatric Populations
Raymond C. Baker, MD;
Charles J. Schubert, MD;
Kelley A. Kirwan, MD;
Siga M. Lenkauskas, MD;
James T. Spaeth, MD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:292-296.
Objectives To compare the content of after-hours medical triage and advice calls regarding private practice patients vs nonprivate practice patients and to assess caregiver compliance with advice resulting from these calls.
Design Survey of after-hours medical triage and advice calls during a 2-week period (September 1 through 15, 1996).
Setting Three private practices (serving approximately 24,000 patients) and 1 urban hospital-based, nonprivate practice (serving approximately 12,000 patients).
Subjects After-hours medical triage and advice calls from caregivers of patients receiving their primary care in these settings.
Main Outcome Measure Compliance with recommended emergency department (ED) or office visit referrals.
Results A total of 286 calls regarding private practice patients and 377 calls regarding nonprivate practice patients were received (P<.001). Eighty-one calls were referred by the nurse directly to the physician. Fifty-nine private practice patients and 59 nonprivate practice patients were referred to the ED. Caregivers of 94 private practice patients and 132 nonprivate practice patients were given home treatment advice. Appointments to be seen at their primary care source were given for 78 private practice patients and 160 nonprivate practice patients. Nonprivate practice patients were more likely to be referred for office care (P=.005); private practice patients were more likely to be referred to the ED (P=.01). Compliance with ED referrals was 42% for patients of nonprivate practice and 46% for private practice; for office visit referrals, compliance was 64% for nonprivate practice and 69% private practice patients (P=.71 for compliance with ED referrals and P=.40 for compliance with office referrals).
Conclusions Compliance with recommended physician encounters was not significantly different (and lower than expected) in both groups of patients. Private practice patients are more likely to be referred to the ED. Calls for nonprivate practice patients are more frequent and these patients are more likely to be referred to their primary care source. This difference may be due to caregivers of patients from nonprivate practices seeking advice for less serious conditions. Physicians should address telephone medicine with caregivers proactively during health maintenance visits.
From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of General and Community Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (Drs Baker and Schubert). Drs Kirwan, Lenkauskas, and Spaeth are in private pediatric practice in Cincinnati.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Standardization of Telephone Triage in Pediatric Oncology
Black
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing 2007;24:190-199.
ABSTRACT
Parental Compliance with After Hours Telephone Triage Advice: Nurse Advice Service versus On-Call Pediatricians
Lee et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2003;42:613-619.
ABSTRACT
Do callers to NHS Direct follow the advice to attend an accident and emergency department?
Foster et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2003;20:285-288.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Nurse telephone triage for same day appointments in general practice: multiple interrupted time series trial of effect on workload and costs
Richards et al.
BMJ 2002;325:1214-1214.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Needs Assessment for Establishing an After-Hours Telephone Medicine Curriculum
Ozuah
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:856-857.
FULL TEXT
After-Hours Telephone Calls to Obstetrician-Gynecologists
SMULIAN et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:459-464.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reducing After-Hours Referrals by an After-Hours Call Center With Second-Level Physician Triage
Kempe et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:226-230.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pediatric Residents' Telephone Triage Experience: Do Parents Really Follow Telephone Advice?
Crane and Benjamin
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:71-74.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
