 |
 |

Effect of Newborn Screening for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
Patrick G. Brosnan, MD;
Christine A. Brosnan, DrPH;
Stephen F. Kemp, MD, PhD;
David B. Domek, MD;
David H. Jelley, MD;
Piers R. Blackett, MD;
William J. Riley, MD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:1272-1278.
Objective To compare the incidence of diagnosis and morbidity in newborns who were screened with newborns who were not screened for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH).
Design A retrospective cohort study.
Setting Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Patients An unscreened population in Arkansas and Oklahoma (n = 400 118) was compared with a screened population in Texas (n = 1 613 378) during a 5-year period. Simultaneous data were collected on the incidence of diagnosis and associated morbidity in patients with CAH.
Main Outcome Measures Diagnosis of CAH, age (in days) at diagnosis, and frequency and length of initial hospitalization.
Results The incidence of diagnosis of classic CAH per 100,000 newborns in the unscreened cohort (5.75) and in the screened cohort (6.26) was similar (relative risk, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.44). The unscreened group had 0.73 fewer male newborns with salt-wasting CAH diagnosed per 100,000 newborns (relative risk, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-1.56). The median age at diagnosis was 26 days for male newborns with salt-wasting CAH in the unscreened cohort vs 12 days in the screened cohort (z = 2.49; P = .01). Male newborns with simple-virilizing CAH and newborns with nonclassic CAH were detected only in the screened cohort.
Conclusions There was not a statistically significant (P = .73) increase in the diagnosis of salt-wasting CAH in the screened cohort. Male newborns benefited as a result of significantly (P = .01) earlier diagnosis, reduced morbidity, and shorter lengths of hospitalization. Large collaborative studies or meta-analyses are needed to determine the life-saving benefits of screening.
From the Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine (Dr P. G. Brosnan), and the Department of Systems and Technology, School of Nursing (Dr C. A. Brosnan), The University of TexasHouston Health Science Center; the Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock (Dr Kemp); Department of Pediatrics, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Okla (Dr Domek); the Warren Clinic Diabetes Center and the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Tulsa (Dr Jelley); the Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (Dr Blackett); and the Department of Medical Education, Driscoll Children's Hospital, Corpus Christi, Tex (Dr Riley).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Estimation of the false-negative rate in newborn screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia
Votava et al.
Eur J Endocrinol 2005;152:869-874.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency
Forest
Hum Reprod Update 2004;10:469-485.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Improving Neonatal Screening for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
Speiser
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004;89:3685-3686.
FULL TEXT
Antenatal Corticosteroids and Newborn Screening for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
King et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:1038-1042.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Analyzing the Cost of Neonatal Screening for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
Brosnan et al.
Pediatrics 2001;107:1238-1238.
FULL TEXT
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia due to 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency
White and Speiser
Endocr. Rev. 2000;21:245-291.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|