You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 153 No. 11, November 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Educational Intervention
 This Article
 •Full text
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Child Development
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Teaching Residents About Development and Behavior

Meeting the New Challenge

Carolyn Frazer, MD; S. Jean Emans, MD; Elizabeth Goodman, MD; Maria Luoni; Terrill Bravender, MD; John Knight, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:1190-1194.

Objective  To determine the teaching methods, materials currently used, and unmet needs for teaching developmental-behavioral pediatrics (DBP) at pediatric training programs in the United States.

Design  Cross-sectional survey of US pediatric residency training programs. The survey questionnaire consisted of 3 instruments: a program director survey, a developmental-behavioral pediatrics survey, and an adolescent medicine survey.

Participants  Survey packets were mailed in January 1997 to 211 programs identified by mailing labels from the Association of Pediatric Program Directors.

Results  Data from 148 programs (70%) completing both the DBP survey and program director survey were analyzed. Ninety-five percent of programs reported a block rotation, and 95% of those stated that the rotation was mandatory. Eighty-seven percent had a formal curriculum. Most programs reported using articles, lecture outlines, and precepting for teaching DBP. Few programs used standardized case-based or computerized materials. Most programs, however, indicated a desire for these materials. Few programs felt that 4 topics were covered adequately: adoption (12%), violence (24%), substance use (28%), and conduct problems (41%). Programs that perceived that they covered these topics adequately were more likely to use written cases as part of their curriculum (Mann-Whitney test, 1373.5; P = .04). Barriers to teaching included lack of adequate faculty, time, money, and curricular resources.

Conclusions  Pediatric residency programs have made significant gains in mandatory DBP training. However, many programs report a lack of adequate faculty, teaching materials, and methods. Responding programs indicated an interest in case-based materials. This approach may represent an alternative and underutilized resource for teaching DBP.


From the Divisions of General Pediatrics (Drs Frazer and Knight) and Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine (Dr Emans, Goodman, and Bravender and Ms Luoni), Children's Hospital and the Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School (Dr Frazer, Emans, Goodman, Bravender, and Knight and Ms Luoni), Boston, Mass.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Resident Training in Developmental/Behavioral Pediatrics: Where Do We Stand?
Boreman et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2007;46:135-145.
ABSTRACT  

Pediatric Training and Job Market Trends: Results From the American Academy of Pediatrics Third-Year Resident Survey, 1997-2002
Cull et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:787-792.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.