You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 153 No. 11, November 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Immunization
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Impact of Resident Feedback on Immunization Outcomes

Cynthia T. Rust, MD; Faye A. Sisk, PhD; Anna R. Kuo, MD; Joy Smith, MD; Rogena Miller, MD; Kevin M. Sullivan, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:1165-1169.

Objective  To investigate the effect on immunization levels of retrospective written feedback to residents regarding missed immunization opportunities.

Design  Randomized trial with control group.

Setting  Pediatric resident continuity clinic in an urban hospital-based primary care clinic.

Participants  Thirty-two postgraduate level 2 and postgraduate level 3 pediatric residents.

Intervention  Monthly retrospective written feedback mailed to residents detailing their missed immunization opportunities and appointment failure rates over a 12-month period beginning in February 1997.

Main Outcome Measures  The immunization level of 2-year-old children in the resident clinic was the main outcome of interest. Secondary outcomes included missed immunization opportunity rates and appointment failure rates.

Results  Postintervention immunization levels were 71.4% (95% confidence limits [CLs]: 63.2%, 78.7%) for patients from the intervention group and 68.5% (95% CLs: 60.8%, 75.4%) for patients from the control group. The immunization level for patients of both groups who had fewer than 2 visits during the second year of life was 47.2% (95% CLs: 38.2%, 56.3%). This compares with an immunization level of 78.1% (95% CLs: 66.0%, 87.5%) for patients from both groups who had 2 visits during the second year of life, and with an immunization level of 88.2% (95% CLs: 81.0%, 93.4%) for patients of both groups who had more than 2 visits during the second year of life (P<.001).

Conclusions  In this setting, written retrospective feedback to residents was an ineffective strategy for improving immunization levels. Adequate follow-up during the second year of life is critical in achieving high immunization levels.


From the Emory University School of Medicine (Drs Rust, Kuo, Smith, Miller, and Sullivan) and the Mercer University Stetson School of Business and Economics (Dr Sisk), Atlanta, Ga.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.