This Article  • Full text  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (18)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Physical Examination  • Alert me on articles by topic

Nancy D. Kellogg, MD; Juan M. Parra, MD, MPH; Shirley Menard, RN, PhD, CPNP

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:634-641.

Objective  To determine whether children referred to a sexual abuse clinic because of anogenital symptoms or signs have examination findings that are suggestive of or probable or definitive for sexual abuse.

Design  Case series of 157 patients.

Setting  Child and adolescent ambulatory care sexual abuse clinic.

Results  A medical records review of 3660 cases was done; 157 cases were identified for study. Most (75%) referrals were from medical clinics. Of 184 complaints, the most common presenting symptom or sign was anogenital bleeding or bruising (29.3%), followed by irritation or redness (21.7%), abnormal anogenital anatomy (20.7%), vaginal discharge (18.4%), lesions (6.5%), and "other" symptoms or signs (3.3%). We used a standardized classification system and determined that 25 patients (15%) had examination findings in the sexual abuse clinic that were suggestive of or probable or definitive for sexual abuse. Although 85 patients had examination findings that corroborated the presenting symptom(s), 70 had nonspecific examination findings or a diagnosis other than sexual abuse. Seventy-two patients had normal examination findings. Only patients with the presenting symptom of lesions had an increased likelihood of a sexual abuse diagnosis. Common examination findings included anogenital erythema, enhanced vascularity of the hymen or vestibule in prepubertal girls, labial adhesions, and culture-negative vaginitis.

Conclusions  Few children are referred for sexual abuse evaluations based on physical signs or symptoms alone. Children with anogenital symptoms but without a disclosure or suspicion of sexual abuse are unlikely to have examination findings suggestive of abuse. The evaluation of children with anogenital symptoms and signs should include a consideration of alternative conditions and causes not directly related to sexual abuse.

From the Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics (Drs Kellogg and Parra), and the Department of Family Nursing Care (Dr Menard), University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Unmet Health Care Needs Among Children Evaluated for Sexual Assault
Girardet et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:70-73.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anogenital and Respiratory Tract Human Papillomavirus Infections Among Children: Age, Gender, and Potential Transmission Through Sexual Abuse
Sinclair et al.
Pediatrics 2005;116:815-825.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Evaluation of Sexual Abuse in Children
Kellogg and and the Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect
Pediatrics 2005;116:506-512.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Healing Patterns in Anogenital Injuries: A Longitudinal Study of Injuries Associated With Sexual Abuse, Accidental Injuries, or Genital Surgery in the Preadolescent Child
Heppenstall-Heger et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:829-837.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Evaluation of Sexual Abuse in Children Without Disclosed or Witnessed Abuse
Bowen and Aldous
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:1160-1164.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT