You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 5, May 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Efficacy of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters Placed in Noncentral Veins

Ravi R. Thiagarajan, MBBS, MRCP; Susan L. Bratton, MD, MPH; Theresa Gettmann, RN, BSN; Chandra Ramamoorthy, MBBS, FRCA

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:436-439.

Background  Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) are commonly used intravenous access devices in children. Although PICCs are intended to be placed in central veins, many fail to reach this location. These noncentral PICCs are used for administration of medications and isotonic solutions.

Objectives  To examine the efficacy of noncentral PICCs for completion of therapy, the complications associated with their use, and the effectiveness of noncentral PICCs as compared with PICCs placed in a central vein.

Design  A prospective cohort study of children in whom PICCs were inserted, from January 1, 1994, to January 1, 1996.

Setting  A university-affiliated teaching institution.

Main Outcome Measurement  Completion of intravenous therapy.

Results  A total of 587 PICCs were studied. Thirty-nine percent of PICCs were placed in noncentral veins. Centrally placed PICCs had significantly longer catheter duration compared with those placed noncentrally (16.6 vs 11.4 days, respectively). However, central and noncentral PICCs had similar therapy completion rates (73% and 69%, respectively). Catheter failure because of occlusion and accidental dislodgment were similar for central and noncentral PICCs. Likewise, complications caused by exit-site infection, phlebitis, and catheter-associated sepsis were also similar for catheters in the 2 locations. Catheter survival curves were similar for central and noncentral PICCs.

Conclusions  Our study demonstrates that PICCs placed in noncentral veins provide reliable and safe intravenous access for administration of many medications and isotonic solutions for about 2 weeks' duration. The placement of PICCs in central veins may be restricted to those children who need central vascular access because of the type of intended therapy.


From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine (Drs Thiagarajan, Bratton, and Ramamoorthy), and the Departments of Anesthesia and Critical Care (Drs Thiagarajan, Bratton, and Ramamoorthy) and Nursing (Ms Gettmann), Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Seattle, Wash.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Percutaneously Inserted Central Catheter for Total Parenteral Nutrition in Neonates: Complications Rates Related to Upper Versus Lower Extremity Insertion
Hoang et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e1152-e1159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pediatric Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Complication Rates Related to Catheter Tip Location
Racadio et al.
Pediatrics 2001;107:28e-28.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.