You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 4, April 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Impact of Interventions by a Community-Based Organization on Inner-city Vaccination Coverage

Fulton County, Georgia, 1992-1993

Charles W. LeBaron, MD; Debi Starnes, PhD; Eugene F. Dini, MPA; Julie W. Chambliss, BA; Michael Chaney, MBA

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:327-332.

Objective  To evaluate the impact of interventions by a community-based organization on immunization rates.

Design  Controlled community intervention trial.

Setting and Participants  Children aged 3 to 59 months in Fulton County, Georgia, who were patients of 1 of 4 public clinics (clinic based), or residents of 1 of 9 inner-city communities (residence based).

Interventions  (1) Clinic-based intervention included monthly review of clinic vaccination records to identify undervaccinated children followed by contact with family (reminder-recall strategy); (2) residence-based intervention included door-to-door assessment and education campaigns followed by mobile van vaccinations, temporary on-site vaccination stations, free child care and transportation to providers, incentives of food and baby products, focus groups, and coalitions with local organizations (community saturation with vaccination messages and opportunities).

Outcome Measures  Change in vaccination rates after 1 year based on clinic record reviews and population surveys.

Results  For clinic-based intervention, series completion rates improved from 43% (87/204) to 58% (99/170) in intervention clinics (P=.003), while rates in control clinics did not change from the baseline of 52% (81/157 to 78/150), for a net difference between intervention and control arms of +15 percentage points (P=.046). For residence-based intervention, age-appropriate vaccination rates improved from 44% (154/347) to 61% (260/429) in intervention communities (+17 percentage points; P<.001) compared with improvement of 44% (78/178) to 58% (129/221) for control communities (+14 percentage points; P=.004), but the difference between arms was not significant (+3 percentage points, P=.78).

Conclusions  Reminder-recall activities by the community-based organization improved vaccination rates in intervention clinics compared with control clinics. A statistically significant impact on vaccination rates could not be detected for residence-based interventions by the community-based organization.


From the National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Dr LeBaron and Mr Dini), EMSTAR Research (Dr Starnes and Ms Chambliss), and Georgia Division of Public Health (Mr Chaney), Atlanta, Ga.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Methodological Difficulties in Assessing Contributions by Community-Based Organizations to Improving Child Health
Matilde Irigoyen and Sally E. Findley
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(4):318-320.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

REACH 2010: New York City: Effective Strategies for Integrating Immunization Promotion Into Community Programs
Findley et al.
Health Promot Pract 2009;10:128S-137S.
ABSTRACT  

Timeliness of Childhood Vaccinations in the United States: Days Undervaccinated and Number of Vaccines Delayed
Luman et al.
JAMA 2005;293:1204-1211.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Impact of Reminder-Recall Interventions on Low Vaccination Coverage in an Inner-City Population
LeBaron et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:255-261.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Community-Provider Partnerships to Reduce Immunization Disparities: Field Report From Northern Manhattan
Findley et al.
AJPH 2003;93:1041-1044.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Timeliness of Childhood Immunizations
Luman et al.
Pediatrics 2002;110:935-939.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reducing Geographic, Racial, and Ethnic Disparities in Childhood Immunization Rates by Using Reminder/Recall Interventions in Urban Primary Care Practices
Szilagyi et al.
Pediatrics 2002;110:e58-58.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Strategies to Decrease Tuberculosis in US Homeless Populations: A Computer Simulation Model
Brewer et al.
JAMA 2001;286:834-842.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Economic Analysis of a Child Vaccination Project Among Asian Americans in Philadelphia, Pa
Deuson et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:909-914.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Patient Reminder/Recall Interventions on Immunization Rates: A Review
Szilagyi et al.
JAMA 2000;284:1820-1827.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Resident Feedback on Immunization Outcomes
Rust et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:1165-1169.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Methodological Difficulties in Assessing Contributions by Community-Based Organizations to Improving Child Health
Irigoyen and Findley
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:318-320.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.