 |
|
Neonatal Circumcision
Randomized Trial of a Sucrose Pacifier for Pain Control
Marguerite Herschel, MD;
Babak Khoshnood, MD, MPH;
Carol Ellman, MD;
Noemi Maydew, MD;
Robert Mittendorf, MD, DrPH
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:279-284.
Objective To assess the effectiveness of oral sucrose via a nipple compared with no treatment and dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) for alleviating pain in neonatal circumcision.
Design Randomized control trial. Data analysis performed by investigators blinded to the 3 treatment groups.
Setting University teaching hospital, General Care Nursery.
Patients One hundred nineteen full-term male, normal birth weight neonates, 12 hours old or older.
Interventions No treatment (our standard care), DPNB, or oral sucrose prior to circumcision.
Main Outcome Measures Differences between groups in heart rate and oxygen saturation changes from baseline during specified intervals of the circumcision procedure. Differences between groups in loss of data due to episodes of excessive motion.
Results Sucrose gave significant (P<.001) pain relief compared with the no treatment control throughout most of the circumcision and particularly in the early stages of the procedure. Overall, the average difference in the elevation of heart rates during the circumcision operative procedure among the 3 groups and the 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were as follows: control vs DPNB, 27.1 beats/min (17.6,36.6) and control vs sucrose, 9.7 beats/min (0.1,19.3). Furthermore, newborns who received either DPNB or sucrose had less loss of oxygen saturation data due to excessive motion during the procedure than the no-treatment controls. The total percentages of lost data due to excessive motion in the 3 groups were 31% for control, 10% for DPNB, and 8% for sucrose. Relative risk and 95% CIs were: DPNB vs control, 0.32 (0.23,0.43); sucrose vs control, 0.26 (0.18,0.36). Differences in oxygen saturation among the 3 groups during the circumcision operative procedure were statistically (P<.001), but perhaps not clinically, significant. However, the analysis did not include missing data due to excessive motion, which occurred predominantly in the no-treatment control group.
Conclusion Sucrose on a pacifier is an inexpensive and effective method for pain relief in neonatal circumcision when DPNB is not desirable.
Departments of Pediatrics (Drs Herschel, Khoshnood, and Ellman) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs Maydew and Mittendorf), The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, and The Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies (Dr Khoshnood), The University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
A Review of CAM for Procedural Pain in Infancy: Part I. Sucrose and Non-nutritive Sucking
Tsao et al.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2007;0:nem084v1-nem084.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Consensus Statement for the Prevention and Management of Pain in the Newborn
Anand and and the International Evidence-Based Group for Neo
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:173-180.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Combined Analgesia and Local Anesthesia to Minimize Pain During Circumcision
Taddio et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:620-623.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Circumcision---The Debates Goes On
Preiser; et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:681-684.
FULL TEXT
Skin-to-Skin Contact Is Analgesic in Healthy Newborns
Gray et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:e14-e14.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Randomised trial of analgesic effects of sucrose, glucose, and pacifiers in term neonates
Carbajal et al.
BMJ 1999;319:1393-1397.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Comparison of the Mogen and Gomco Clamps in Combination With Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Minimizing the Pain of Neonatal Circumcision
Kurtis et al.
Pediatrics 1999;103:23e-23.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pain Relief for Neonatal Circumcision: Serious Design Flaws?
Van Howe; et al.
Pediatrics 1999;103:196-196.
FULL TEXT
Other Articles Noted
Evid. Based Nurs. 1998;1:100-104.
FULL TEXT
Neonatal Circumcision
Van Howe and Cold
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:931-931.
FULL TEXT
|
