You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 10, October 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Educational Intervention
 This Article
 •Full text
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Correcting the Bias of Clerkship Timing on Academic Performance

Julie E. Cho, AB; John M. Belmont, PhD; Cheng T. Cho, MD PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:1015-1018.

Objectives  To document the time-of-year bias in National Board of Medical Examiners subject examination (NBME) scores in a third-year pediatrics clerkship and to develop a grading method that neutralizes the bias.

Design  Interventional modeling of final grades.

Setting  University-based medical school.

Subjects and Methods  During each of the past 3 academic years, we conducted six 2-month pediatric clerkships for third-year students. To counter the time-of-year bias, NBME scores, clinical evaluations, and departmental examination scores for the current rotation were pooled with those from the rotations from the same time of year during the previous 2 years. Final grades for the current rotation were determined by cutoff points derived from that entire 3-year pool. We analyzed this approach by testing the time-of-year effects on NBME scores, clinical evaluations, and final grades while maintaining step 1 of the US Medical Licensing Examination as a preclinical baseline control.

Results  The scores for step 1 of the US Medical Licensing Examination did not differ significantly by time of year. Clinical evaluations and NBME scores showed significant upward trends as the academic year progressed. By contrast, according to design, final grades showed no significant time-of-year trend.

Conclusions  Our results support previous reports of significant improvements in NBME scores across the academic year. Our method of computing final grades corrects for this time-of-year bias by judging students only in relation to those who took the rotation at the same time of year. It is our belief that the prevalence and significance of the time-of-year trend warrants such an adjustment in grading to help minimize the academic disadvantage faced by students early in their clinical training.


From the Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Timing Bias in the Psychiatry Subject Examination of the National Board of Medical Examiners
Manley and Heiss
Acad. Psychiatry 2006;30:116-119.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship of Rotation Timing to Pattern of Clerkship Performance in Psychiatry
Park et al.
Acad. Psychiatry 2005;29:267-273.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.