 |
|
Physician Concerns About Vaccine Adverse Effects and Potential Litigation
Richard Kent Zimmerman, MD, MPH;
James J. Schlesselman, PhD;
Tammy A. Mieczkowski, MA;
Anne R. Medsger, RN, MSHyg;
Mahlon Raymund, PhD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:12-19.
Objective To understand physician concerns about litigation and beliefs regarding vaccine safety.
Design A stratified random sample of family physicians, pediatricians, and general practitioners younger than 65 years who were in office-based practices across the United States was selected from the American Medical Association list that includes nonmembers. A standardized telephone survey was conducted by trained interviewers in 1995.
Participants Physicians seeing 5 or more patients per week younger than 6 years and having 50% or more primary care patients were eligible for the study.
Results Of the 1236 physicians who were surveyed, 32% and 13% overestimated the risk for serious adverse effects related to pertussis and measles vaccines, respectively. Among physicians who thought that serious adverse effects from diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (DTP) were unlikely, 15% were highly concerned about litigation; however, among those with higher ratings of the likelihood of serious adverse effects, 38% were highly concerned about vaccine litigation (P<.01). Of those aware of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, only 41% believed that it afforded a high level of liability protection; 22% believed that it gives little protection, and 37% gave an intermediate answer. Among physicians highly concerned about vaccine litigation, 22% were unlikely to recommend the third dose of DTP for a child with a fever of 39.4°C and no other symptoms after the second dose of DTP, whereas among those expressing little concern about litigation, only 12% were unlikely to vaccinate (P<.05). Although some physicians were concerned about litigation, most (86%) encouraged vaccination even if a parent was argumentative about possible adverse effects.
Conclusion Physicians' perceptions about the risk for adverse effects and protection afforded by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program influence their concern about litigation and, to a lesser extent, their reported likelihood to administer immunizations.
From the Department of Family Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology (Drs Zimmerman, Schlesselman, and Raymund and Ms Mieczkowski), School of Medicine and the Department of Health Services Administration, Graduate School of Public Health (Dr Zimmerman and Ms Medsger), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Vaccine Liability and Safety Revisited
Geoffrey Evans
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(1):7-10.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Addressing Parents' Concerns About Childhood Immunizations: A Tutorial for Primary Care Providers
Levi
Pediatrics 2007;120:18-26.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Role of Parental Preferences in the Management of Fever Without Source Among 3- to 36-Month-Old Children: A Decision Analysis
Madsen et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1067-1076.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Childhood Vaccine Risk/Benefit Communication in Private Practice Office Settings: A National Survey
Davis et al.
Pediatrics 2001;107:17e-17.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Combination Vaccines for Childhood Immunization: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP)
Committee on Infectious Diseases, 1998MIHNEAndash1 et al.
Pediatrics 1999;103:1064-1077.
FULL TEXT
A Statewide Survey of General Practitioners in NSW, Australia, about Immunisation and Strategies to Increase Childhood Immunisation Rates
Guevarra et al.
Asia Pac J Public Health 1999;11:20-25.
ABSTRACT
Vaccine Liability and Safety Revisited
Evans
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:7-10.
FULL TEXT
|
