You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 9, September 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A drop in pediatric subject examination scores after curriculum changes that emphasize general pediatric topics

M. J. Potts and K. W. Phelan
Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois, College of Medicine at Rockford, 61104, USA. michaelp@uic.edu

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether emphasizing a limited number of general pediatric objectives and using a test based on them would improve student knowledge of the topic areas. DESIGN: Before-after trial. SETTING: Community-based medical school. SUBJECTS: Third-year medical students on a required clerkship in pediatrics. INTERVENTION: Six core objectives: recognizing the seriously ill child, stabilizing such a child, fluid and electrolyte requirements and therapy, newborn care, well child care, and variability of normal vital signs in children based on their age were defined and a modified essay examination was constructed. The test was given to pediatric students close to the end of their clerkship. In study year 1, no warning was given about the examination and results did not affect student grades. In study year 2, passing all items was a requirement and failure required remedial oral examination of any missed items. All students completed the National Board of Medical Examiners pediatric subject examination. RESULTS: For 7 of 8 essay items, significant increases in numbers of students passing were seen in study year 2, but students scored 51 points lower on the National Board of Medical Examiners pediatric subject examination (P=.002). The decrease in scores was not seen in any other clerkship or among pediatric students from a different campus of the medical school. CONCLUSIONS: Emphasis on core objectives and an essay examination significantly improved students' knowledge of the defined topics but decreased the scores on the National Board of Medical Examiners subject examination. This may be attributable to a difference in content between the 2 tests. Faculty proposing new curriculum guidelines need to review student assessment methods to avoid such unexpected changes in scores.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clerkship Curricular Revision Based on the Ambulatory Pediatric Association and the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics Guidelines: Does It Make a Difference?
Kuo and Slavin
Pediatrics 1999;103:898-901.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Curriculum Changes Need Not Be Bad
Rauch et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:210-211.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.